2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB107
HB107 establishes a framework for a statewide sickle cell disease registry, with patient consent and confidentiality protections.
Official caption: Relating to the establishment of the sickle cell disease registry.
Official report lists House author(s): Simmons, Rose, Collier, Jones, Venton, Oliverson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB107 establishes a framework for a statewide sickle cell disease registry, with patient consent and confidentiality protections.
- Implementation is tied to funding: The Department of State Health Services is required to implement a provision only if the Legislature appropriates money specifically for that purpose.
- Under the statutory framework, the department establishes and maintains the registry as a single repository of sickle cell disease cases occurring in Texas and other information the Health and Human Services Commission's executive commissioner considers necessary and appropriate for treatment or a cure.
- Being diagnosed does not eliminate consent: Rules must require the individual or a legally authorized representative to consent before any information relating to that individual is included in the registry, and must allow that consent to be withdrawn.
- Registry records are not public information, are exempt from the Public Information Act, are not subject to subpoena and cannot otherwise be released except as the statute allows.
- Medical or disease-pattern information may be released for statistics in a way that prevents identification of patients, facilities, laboratories and practitioners, or with the consent of each person identified.
What does it do?
HB107 establishes a framework for a statewide sickle cell disease registry, with patient consent and confidentiality protections. The purpose is to collect more complete information that may help treatment and research. It does not itself provide treatment, pay patients’ medical bills or guarantee a cure. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; official history.
Implementation is tied to funding. The Department of State Health Services is required to implement a provision only if the Legislature appropriates money specifically for that purpose. Without such an appropriation, it may use other available money, but is not required to do so. The bill itself does not appropriate money. This briefing does not determine whether a separate appropriation satisfied that condition or whether the registry is fully operational. Final law, Section 2.
Under the statutory framework, the department establishes and maintains the registry as a single repository of sickle cell disease cases occurring in Texas and other information the Health and Human Services Commission’s executive commissioner considers necessary and appropriate for treatment or a cure. Hospitals and other facilities providing diagnosis or treatment must provide the prescribed data. The department may contract for implementation, analyze information and publish useful statistical studies, and must submit an annual report to the Legislature. Final law, Sections 52B.001–.004 and 52B.006.
Being diagnosed does not eliminate consent. Rules must require the individual or a legally authorized representative to consent before any information relating to that individual is included in the registry, and must allow that consent to be withdrawn. The act does not spell out a deletion timetable or every detail of the withdrawal procedure. Rules must also protect confidentiality, comply with federal health-privacy requirements and other applicable law, and restrict use or disclosure of Medicaid information to purposes directly connected with administering Medicaid. Required implementation rules were to be adopted as soon as practicable after the effective date. Final law, Section 52B.004 and bill Section 3.
Registry records are not public information, are exempt from the Public Information Act, are not subject to subpoena and cannot otherwise be released except as the statute allows. The department may use them confidentially, as may people or public/private entities it determines are necessary for the chapter’s purposes. This is a controlled-use system, not a promise that nobody besides the patient can ever access information. Final law, Section 52B.005(a)–(b).
Medical or disease-pattern information may be released for statistics in a way that prevents identification of patients, facilities, laboratories and practitioners, or with the consent of each person identified. State employees cannot testify about the existence or contents of the covered medical records without the individual’s advance consent. Information provided to a registry or researcher remains confidential, and the department’s institutional review board must review and approve requests for access to information identifying individuals. That approval requirement is an additional safeguard, not a blanket waiver of the other restrictions. Final law, Section 52B.005(c)–(f).
What changed along the way?
The filed, House committee and engrossed texts had the same basic registry plan, including general confidentiality and federal-privacy requirements. The official index lists one floor amendment: Miles’s Senate amendment, adopted May 20, 2025. It added consent before inclusion, the ability to withdraw consent, special Medicaid-use restrictions, the detailed confidentiality section, safeguards for identifiable information, and the funding condition. These were substantial changes, not wording-only edits. Filed text; Senate amendment; amendment index.
The House concurred in the Senate amendment May 28, so the final law includes those safeguards without a conference compromise. The final House concurrence vote was 96–31 with two present but not voting; the Senate vote was 25–6. A description based only on the original proposal would miss both patient choice and the appropriation condition. Version index; enrolled certifications.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Patients, clinicians and researchers may benefit from better information about sickle cell disease in Texas. Consent and confidentiality requirements protect patient choice, while participation rates and data quality will affect how complete and useful the registry becomes. The law does not establish measured improvements in care.
Health facilities would need to supply data, and agencies would need systems, staff and procedures for consent, security, analysis and reports. The final fiscal note estimates $4,795,371 in state general-revenue costs over fiscal 2026–27: $3,346,894 in 2026 and $1,448,477 in 2027. It assumes 4.5 additional full-time-equivalent positions in the first year and five afterward, with substantial initial technology costs. Later annual estimates are roughly $748,000–$750,000 for 2028–30. Those are projected costs if implemented, not proof of an appropriation or actual spending. Final fiscal note.
The note anticipates no significant local-government fiscal impact. It does not quantify every private facility’s reporting burden, and it does not establish that the registry will pay for itself or produce a particular medical benefit. Final fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.