← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB109
HB109 broadens the state-facility framework for residential treatment of certain juveniles beyond a single named center and permits a direct, one-time grant mechanism for certain funded inpatient mental-health projects.
Official caption: Relating to the construction, expansion, and operation of certain inpatient mental health facilities and the designation of residential treatment facilities for certain juveniles.
Official report lists House author(s): Rose, Thompson, Jones, Jolanda, Plesa, Leo Wilson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB109 broadens the state-facility framework for residential treatment of certain juveniles beyond a single named center and permits a direct, one-time grant mechanism for certain funded inpatient mental-health projects.
- Previously, the admission provision specified the Waco Center for Youth.
- Residents of designated facilities must receive appropriate educational services without charge, paid from funds appropriated for that purpose.
- The existing separate prohibition on admitting certain juveniles with delinquency or conduct-in-need-of-supervision findings to the Waco Center for Youth remains unchanged.
- For certain inpatient mental-health construction, expansion or operation projects, if the Legislature appropriates money to the Health and Human Services Commission for that purpose under the referenced authority, the commission may award it directly to an entity as a one-time grant.
What does it do?
HB109 broadens the state-facility framework for residential treatment of certain juveniles beyond a single named center and permits a direct, one-time grant mechanism for certain funded inpatient mental-health projects. It does not itself appropriate construction money or guarantee an available treatment bed. Signed June 20, 2025, it took effect September 1, 2025. Final law; official history.
Previously, the admission provision specified the Waco Center for Youth. The revised provision directs the Department of State Health Services to designate state facilities for residential treatment of juveniles described by the statute as emotionally disturbed. The covered groups are juveniles admitted under the state’s mental-health admission law to a department facility, and juveniles under the Department of Family and Protective Services’ managing conservatorship who are admitted under that law to a designated state facility. This is not automatic admission for every child or a general designation of private facilities. Final law, Section 2; Health and Safety Code Chapter 554.
Residents of designated facilities must receive appropriate educational services without charge, paid from funds appropriated for that purpose. A resident who does not live in the school district serving the facility’s location may receive the district’s services only with the superintendent’s prior approval. The educational-service obligation extends beyond the former Waco-specific wording; the law does not simply guarantee enrollment in any chosen district. Final law, Section 3.
The existing separate prohibition on admitting certain juveniles with delinquency or conduct-in-need-of-supervision findings to the Waco Center for Youth remains unchanged. HB109 does not rewrite that provision as a blanket ban at every newly designated facility, nor does it itself decide eligibility under every other admission rule. Chapter 554, Section 554.001(b).
For certain inpatient mental-health construction, expansion or operation projects, if the Legislature appropriates money to the Health and Human Services Commission for that purpose under the referenced authority, the commission may award it directly to an entity as a one-time grant. This supplies an optional funding mechanism; it does not award a named recipient money, set a grant amount or remove the need for a qualifying appropriation. Final law, Section 1.
What changed along the way?
The filed bill proposed replacing Waco-specific language with broader references to designated facilities, including in the delinquency-related admission prohibition. The House committee substitute limited the new designations to state facilities and stopped amending that prohibition, leaving it specific to Waco. It also clarified education funding and the relevant local district, and replaced the proposed immediate-effect option with a fixed September 1, 2025 date. Filed text; House substitute.
The Senate committee substitute added the one-time-grant provision for certain inpatient mental-health projects. The House concurred in the Senate changes May 20. The amendment index lists no floor amendments: the material changes came through committee substitutes, not a floor-amendment package. There was no conference compromise. Senate substitute; version index; amendment index; history.
The House’s final concurrence vote was 126–1 with one present but not voting; the Senate passed the bill 31–0. Enrolled certifications.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Eligible young people and their families may benefit if state designations support additional residential-treatment options with educational services. Agencies gain flexibility to administer designated facilities and qualifying grants. The law alone does not establish that new sites have opened, that waiting lists have fallen or that a particular child qualifies.
State agencies must arrange and pay for the required education using appropriated funds, while local school districts and superintendents may need to coordinate services. Construction and operations still require funding; the grant mechanism does not make those activities cost-free.
The final fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact from the bill and assumes associated costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It does not provide a new construction appropriation or quantify every future project that might use the grant authority. Final fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.