← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB12
HB12 adds scheduled efficiency audits for agencies subject to the Texas Sunset Act and strengthens public input, performance measurement and follow-up in Sunset reviews.
Official caption: Relating to the review and audit of certain state agency operations.
Official report lists House author(s): Bell, Keith, Capriglione, Hunter, Spiller, Canales. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB12 adds scheduled efficiency audits for agencies subject to the Texas Sunset Act and strengthens public input, performance measurement and follow-up in Sunset reviews.
- Public participation and performance: the Sunset Advisory Commission must explain how people can participate and, where practicable, seek input from interested parties.
- Sunset reports on regulatory agencies must analyze performance over the preceding 10 years or since the last review, whichever is longer.
- Limited follow-up review: Sunset may recommend a limited review before a regulatory agency’s next full Sunset review, and must recommend one when its recommendations identify rulemaking deficiencies or improvements.
- The State Auditor must arrange an efficiency audit for each entity expressly subject to Sunset, except the 15 river authorities listed in Government Code 325.025(b).
- The auditor’s schedule requires Legislative Audit Committee approval.
What does it do?
HB12 adds scheduled efficiency audits for agencies subject to the Texas Sunset Act and strengthens public input, performance measurement and follow-up in Sunset reviews. Sunset is the Legislature’s process for reviewing whether agencies should continue and how they should improve. The bill does not itself close a particular agency, cut a particular program or guarantee savings. Final law; official history.
Public participation and performance: the Sunset Advisory Commission must explain how people can participate and, where practicable, seek input from interested parties. Each agency under review must post an opening notice and participation information on its website. Regulatory agencies must, where practicable, notify their license/certificate/authorization holders of a review hearing and seek their views; river authorities are exempt from that particular holder-notification/input requirement, not from the general website notice. Here, a regulatory agency is a constitutionally or statutorily created executive-branch body with statewide authority to grant, deny, renew, revoke or suspend an authorization to engage in an activity. (Sections 1–2.)
Sunset reports on regulatory agencies must analyze performance over the preceding 10 years or since the last review, whichever is longer. Reports must evaluate agency performance measures and targets, including whether they fit the agency’s mission and meaningfully assess its goals. After consulting the Legislative Budget Board, Sunset must recommend improvements to key measures and targets. This is not limited to targets printed in the appropriations act. (Sections 3–4.)
Limited follow-up review: Sunset may recommend a limited review before a regulatory agency’s next full Sunset review, and must recommend one when its recommendations identify rulemaking deficiencies or improvements. But the review takes effect only if the Legislature includes it in the agency’s legislation. It covers public participation and rulemaking, employee-conflict rules, efforts to identify unnecessary/ineffective/inefficient rules, and the specified improvement recommendations lawmakers adopt. The agency must report progress by September 1 of the odd-numbered year lawmakers specify; Sunset’s public report is due by January 1 of the following odd-numbered year. For example, a September 2027 agency deadline points to January 2029—not January 2028. There is no automatic six-year follow-up review for every regulator in the enacted law. (Section 5.)
A separate efficiency-audit program
The State Auditor must arrange an efficiency audit for each entity expressly subject to Sunset, except the 15 river authorities listed in Government Code 325.025(b). These include the Brazos, Lower Colorado, Trinity and other named authorities; their existing limited Sunset review is not abolished. This is not a requirement to audit every local government or every entity that happens to receive state money. The statutory list.
The auditor’s schedule requires Legislative Audit Committee approval. An agency’s audit falls in the two-year window starting September 1 four years before its scheduled Sunset abolition date. The bill required adoption of the schedule by January 1, 2026, not completion of all audits by that date. An agency need not also perform a legally required internal efficiency audit in a year when it receives this audit. (Sections 6–7.)
Audits examine whether money, staff, property, technology and other resources are used efficiently and effectively for program beneficiaries; whether resources are diverted from intended purposes; and whether programs duplicate, overlap or conflict with others. They must recommend potential savings and resource reallocations and identify opportunities involving consolidation, outsourcing or elimination of duplicate work. Those are subjects for evaluation and recommendations—not automatic orders to privatize or close services.
The State Auditor, working with the Legislative Budget Board, sets the scope. Subject to committee approval, the auditor decides whether to use its own staff or a private auditor; any private contract must be made by March 1 of the scheduled audit year. The State Auditor and budget board oversee private auditors, who are not subject to direction by the agency being audited. The audited agency pays the State Auditor’s determined audit costs promptly upon billing.
The audit, recommendations and report must go to the named state officials, legislative bodies and agency by November 1 of the audit year, and the State Auditor and agency must publish them online. Within 90 days after receiving the complete audit and recommendations, the agency head must deliver an implementation plan to the specified recipients. An agency may decline a recommendation, but must give a reasoned justification in its plan. (Section 6, new Government Code Chapter 327.)
Timing: HB12 took effect September 1, 2025. This summary describes the enacted requirements; it does not certify that every required audit, schedule or implementation plan has since been completed.
What changed along the way?
All five posted versions and both listed floor amendments were compared. The House concurred in the Senate amendments on May 23; there was no conference report. Text versions; amendment index and dispositions.
- Introduced bill and House committee substitute: originally required routine limited rulemaking reviews beginning six years after an agency was continued. The House committee added river-authority exceptions. These were committee changes, not floor amendments.
- House amendment 1, Keith Bell — adopted April 8: added “reduce fraud, waste, and abuse” and increase-efficiency wording to the report’s catch-all information provision. The Senate substitute removed that wording; its adoption in the House does not make it part of the final text. Amendment text.
- Senate committee substitute: replaced the universal six-year review with the recommendation-and-legislative-authorization system; broadened performance-measure evaluation, required budget-board consultation, and made holder outreach subject to practicability. It narrowed the river-authority notice exception to holder outreach, leaving the general website notice. It also dropped the proposed repeal of Government Code 322.017, so the budget board’s existing discretionary efficiency-review authority remains. Senate text; existing 322.017.
- Senate amendment F1, Parker — adopted May 19: tied limited reviews to the agency legislation prepared under 325.012(c), added other legislatively adopted rulemaking recommendations, replaced the remaining default six-year progress-report language with a legislatively specified odd-year deadline and the next-odd-year Sunset report, and excluded the specifically listed river authorities from the new efficiency audits. All these changes appear in the final law. Amendment text.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Possible benefits: taxpayers and people using public services may gain clearer evidence about program effectiveness and waste; license holders and other interested people get more explicit ways to participate in Sunset review. Public reports and explanations for rejected recommendations make follow-up easier to inspect. Savings or improved services depend on findings and subsequent decisions; the law does not establish a measured savings total.
Costs and trade-offs: agencies must supply information, pay audit costs, evaluate findings and prepare plans. Sunset needs analytical and legal staff. Private auditors may receive contracts, but the law does not promise a particular vendor work or require outsourcing agency services. Staff time spent on oversight also has an opportunity cost; whether it produces larger benefits is not quantified here.
The Legislative Budget Board’s May 20, 2025 final linked fiscal note estimates a $623,388 General Revenue cost for fiscal years 2026–27: $316,694 in 2026 and $306,694 in 2027. It assumes two additional Sunset staff—one attorney and one data analyst—and $306,694 annually in 2028–30. Administrative costs at the State Auditor and audited agencies were assumed absorbable within existing resources; no significant local-government fiscal impact was anticipated. That assumption does not cancel the statute’s agency-paid audit requirement. HB12 makes no appropriation. Final fiscal note.
Earlier introduced/House/engrossed notes estimated $2,812,466 for 2026–27 and eight staff, reflecting the broader routine-review proposal. The Senate and final notes reduced that estimate; the earlier amount should not be presented as the enacted version’s estimate. The final note’s broad description of auditing all Sunset entities also must be read with the final text’s named-river-authority exclusion. Introduced fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.