2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB120

HB120 expands support for career pathways and certain students finishing college-linked programs after high school, and requires more information about what happens to students after they leave school.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to college, career, and military readiness in public schools, including career and technology education programs, the Financial Aid for Swift Transfer (FAST) program, and the Rural Pathway Excellence Partnership (R-PEP) program, funding for those programs under the Foundation School Program, and workforce reporting to support those programs, to the public school accountability system, and to the new instructional facility allotment and the permissible uses of funding under the Foundation School Program.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Bell, Keith, Buckley, Ashby, Gates, Button. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB120 expands support for career pathways and certain students finishing college-linked programs after high school, and requires more information about what happens to students after they leave school. It changes several school-funding rules, but does not make every college course free or guarantee a job. Signed June 20, 2025, most provisions took effect immediately; the Chapter 48 school-finance changes took effect September 1, 2025. Specified course, examination, rural-partnership and counseling changes apply beginning with the 2025–26 school year. Final law, Sections 1–30; history and effective-date remarks.

Finishing a college-linked pathway after graduation. The Financial Aid for Swift Transfer (FAST) program can cover qualifying dual-credit courses for certain graduates who remain enrolled in a designated P-TECH campus or participating Rural Pathway Excellence Partnership (R-PEP) district and are completing the agreed college-linked course of study. P-TECH links high school with college and career preparation; R-PEP supports rural districts’ shared college and career pathways. Students must still meet the other FAST requirements, including enrollment at a participating college and educational-disadvantage eligibility during the current or preceding four school years. This is not universal free college for graduates. HB120, Section 4; SB1786, Sections 1–2, retaining the other FAST conditions.

The Foundation School Program—the state’s principal school-funding system—also expands eligibility to certain graduates under 21 on September 1 who meet the specified enrollment and P-TECH/R-PEP course-of-study conditions. Districts may use funding for graduates’ dual-credit education and for advising their graduates during the first two years after high school toward a public-college certificate or degree or postsecondary vocational training. These are permissions and eligibility rules, not an unconditional payment to every graduate. Final law, Sections 12–14; current Education Code, Sections 48.003–.0035.

Career-course and examination support. Qualifying Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) courses become career and technology education programs, including for the applicable school-funding formula; the funding definition still requires high-school credit. The additional P-TECH amount rises from $50 to $150 per qualifying student in average daily attendance, covering designated-campus enrollment or completion of the specified P-TECH/R-PEP course of study. The old separate New Tech Network campus category is replaced; this is not $150 for every student merely enrolled in any career course. Final law, Sections 5 and 15–16.

Eligible students may receive up to two certification-exam subsidies instead of one; the underlying successful-program/special-education and passing-exam requirements remain. Teacher subsidies expand from cybersecurity exams to career-and-technology-related certification exams. Reimbursable costs can include associated fingerprinting and criminal-history checks. District reimbursement for student examinations is capped statewide at $20 million per school year, including no more than $500,000 for those checks; excess claims are reduced proportionately. High school juniors in spring and seniors gain a commissioner-approved national career-readiness assessment as an alternative within the existing one-time, state-paid assessment choice. Final law, Sections 6, 10–11 and 20–21.

Rural partnerships and facilities. Districts already participating in R-PEP can remain after growing beyond the program’s initial size limit. When enrollment first reaches 1,600, the continued-funding provision allows funding for up to 110% of the number of students qualifying in the preceding school year—not 110% of every district student. The statewide R-PEP allotment and outcomes-bonus cap rises from $5 million to $20 million annually. Separate two-year planning, establishment and expansion grants are capped at $5 million per school year. The law removes the former priority for coordinating entities with specified experience; remaining oversubscription priorities favor older commitments, higher-education partners and districts serving higher proportions of disadvantaged students. Final law, Sections 8, 17 and 26.

The new-instructional-facility allotment can include a renovated portion first used for commissioner-designated high-cost, undersubscribed career programs. Its annual appropriation ceiling rises from $100 million to $150 million. If claims exceed appropriated money, allotments are reduced and the commissioner may remove qualifying career programs from the renovation category. Raising a ceiling is not itself appropriating that amount. Final law, Sections 18–19.

Better information, with privacy limits. TEA must publish de-identified postsecondary and employment outcomes by district or charter school, high school campus and cohort for the ten most recent annual cohorts. The information includes college enrollment, persistence, completion and employment measures, plus specified information for students who did not graduate. Remediation data and nongraduate employment data have availability limits. Publication must comply with federal student-record privacy law; where needed, access can use a private portal for specified school officials and counselors. The law does not authorize a public list of individual students’ wages. Final law, Section 2.

District readiness plans must set goals for credentials earned in high school and graduate outcomes at one, three and five years, including further education and earnings. Annual reports go to trustees, TEA and the Legislative Budget Board and must be posted at least two weeks before the public review-and-approval meeting. TEA must establish a measurable statewide career-readiness goal, update it at least every five years, and make the first update no later than 2028–29. School counselors must annually give students and families additional pathway, cost, completion, wage and My Texas Future information; TEA supplies annual online counselor training. Final law, Sections 1–3, 9 and 27.

Parents of JROTC students must receive notices about available military-related early-registration or scholarship opportunities during high-school registration and annually. The notice must offer an option to share specified student information with public higher-education institutions; it is not an instruction to automatically release every student’s records. Final law, Section 7.

The Texas Workforce Commission must work with employers on enhanced wage filings covering wages, industry, occupation, full-/part-time status, employment county and remote-work status. Because SB1786 became law, HB120’s Section 22 operates and its alternative Section 23 does not. The reporting links to the regional labor-demand assessment; HB120 also updates the industry-certification inventory’s terminology and allows consultation with TEA. These provisions do not establish that every requested dataset is already complete. HB120, Sections 22–25; SB1786 history; current Labor Code Section 204.0025.

What changed along the way?

The House substitute added the graduate FAST expansion, two exam subsidies and a career-readiness assessment option. Earlier drafts also proposed a dedicated advising program and allotment, enrollment-based rather than attendance-based funding, and a military-pathway grant. Bell’s adopted House amendment broadened the proposed advising partnerships and military advising, imposed an 80%-of-time advising requirement and changed the proposed adviser amount from $30,000 to $40,000. That separate advising program and allotment were later removed, so those amounts and staffing rules are not HB120’s final law. Filed text; House substitute; House amendment.

The Senate substitute added outcomes reporting, detailed readiness plans and workforce reporting, but also proposed major accountability-rating changes, a certification-list process, a rural-program school-calendar condition and a separate JROTC funding cap. Schwertner’s adopted Senate amendment removed those latter proposals and the military-pathway grant, restored broader graduate funding, raised the exam-reimbursement cap from $15 million to $20 million, added parent notices and My Texas Future references, and narrowed data duties where information is unavailable. Do not treat the removed accountability, calendar, grant or JROTC-cap proposals as enacted HB120 requirements. The final bill also says it prevails to the extent of conflict with another 2025 regular-session act. Senate substitute; Senate amendment, all 22 items; final law, Section 29.

Those are the two indexed floor amendments. The House concurred in the Senate changes May 28, 116–6 with one present but not voting; the Senate passed the bill 31–0. No conference report was used. Amendment index; all text versions; enrolled certifications.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Eligible students and graduates may gain help finishing credentials, taking certification exams and comparing pathways. Rural partnerships, designated career facilities and participating districts may receive more support. Districts, counselors, colleges, employers and state agencies also face data, privacy, reporting and coordination work. Higher earnings, more completions and better job matches are intended benefits—not outcomes proved by the legislation.

The final fiscal note estimates $213.47 million in state general-revenue-related costs for fiscal years 2026–27: about $105.91 million in 2026 and $107.55 million in 2027. It expects additional school funding and agency staffing and technology costs. However, the additional FAST cost could not be determined because the number of qualifying graduates was unknown. The estimate is therefore not a complete guaranteed ceiling, and HB120 itself makes no appropriation. Earlier, materially different drafts had different estimates; those are not the final-law price. Final fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.