Texas Bills Explained

2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB1211

HB1211 extends the qualifying enrollment deadline for a Texas public-college tuition-and-fee exemption from a student's 25th birthday to their 27th birthday.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to tuition and fee exemptions at public institutions of higher education for certain students who were under the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Lujan, Bhojani, Lalani, LaHood, González, Mary. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB1211 extends the qualifying enrollment deadline for a Texas public-college tuition-and-fee exemption from a student’s 25th birthday to their 27th birthday. The student must enroll as an undergraduate or in a qualifying dual-credit/joint high-school-and-college course by that deadline. This is an enrollment deadline—not a requirement to graduate by 27 or a new statement that an existing exemption ends on the 27th birthday. Final law

The existing qualifying Department of Family and Protective Services conservatorship circumstances remain. Section 54.366(a) covers a student who was in department conservatorship:

  • The day before turning 18.
  • On or after turning 14, if also eligible for adoption on or after that date.
  • On the day of high-school graduation or receipt of an equivalent diploma.
  • The day before an adoption or award of permanent managing conservatorship to a nonparent, when that event was on or after September 1, 2009.
  • During a term when enrolled in a qualifying dual-credit/joint-credit course.

The law does not make every person ever in foster care automatically eligible. A separate existing rule-based route for certain children returned to a parent remains in Section 54.366(c); HB1211 does not rewrite that route. Full exemption statute

The act took effect September 1, 2025, and applies beginning with tuition and fees charged for the fall 2025 semester. Earlier terms remain under prior law. Although the bill contained a possible immediate-effect clause, the official history records September 1; the House’s final concurrence had 95 affirmative votes, below two-thirds of its 150 members. History

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee and engrossed versions would have removed the enrollment-age deadline entirely, with a conforming reference change in subsection (c). The Senate committee substitute instead retained a deadline and moved it from 25 to 27, dropping the proposed subsection (c) edit. That narrower expansion is the final law; the Senate and enrolled operative texts match.

The amendment index lists no floor amendments. The material change came through the Senate committee substitute, followed by House concurrence May 29, 2025. Governor Abbott signed the bill June 20. Text versions · Introduced · House committee · Engrossed · Senate substitute · Amendment index

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Otherwise eligible students who missed the old enrollment deadline gain a two-year longer window. Institutions may forgo tuition and fee revenue for additional eligible students. The exemption does not itself pay rent, food or every other college expense, and the act does not guarantee admission or a particular dollar saving.

All five indexed Legislative Budget Board notes say the fiscal impact cannot be determined because the number of eligible students is unknown; institutional impact depends on participation. They anticipate no significant local-government fiscal impact and provide no quantified two-year/five-year cost.

The later notes contain an important wording error: they say the bill would “remove” enrollment by the 27th birthday. The final statute plainly retains an enrollment deadline and changes 25 to 27. The earlier notes concern the House’s discarded proposal to eliminate the deadline. Neither narrative should replace the final law. Introduced fiscal note · Engrossed note · Senate-substitute note · Passed-second-house note · Final indexed note

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.