2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB135
HB135 expressly adds two categories to Texas's sales-and-use-tax exemptions for agricultural items: exotic animals defined by Tax Code 23.51 and game animals described by Parks and Wildlife Code 63.001.
Official caption: Relating to exemptions from sales and use taxes for game animals and exotic animals.
Official report lists House author(s): Button, Noble, Turner, Capriglione, Meyer. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB135 expressly adds two categories to Texas's sales-and-use-tax exemptions for agricultural items: exotic animals defined by Tax Code 23.51 and game animals described by Parks and Wildlife Code 63.001.
- The definitions limit the exemption: The game-animal provision lists mule and white-tailed deer, pronghorn antelope, desert bighorn sheep, specified squirrels and collared peccary/javelina, with an indigenous-to-Texas condition.
- What it does not change: This is a tax rule for the animals, not a general exemption for hunting trips, licenses, equipment or every ranch expense.
- The bill received the votes for immediate effect and became law May 13, 2025.
What does it do?
HB135 expressly adds two categories to Texas’s sales-and-use-tax exemptions for agricultural items: exotic animals defined by Tax Code 23.51 and game animals described by Parks and Wildlife Code 63.001. The fiscal analysis says this puts common industry and comptroller enforcement practice into statute, rather than creating a large new tax break from scratch. Final law; official history; latest fiscal note.
The definitions limit the exemption. The game-animal provision lists mule and white-tailed deer, pronghorn antelope, desert bighorn sheep, specified squirrels and collared peccary/javelina, with an indigenous-to-Texas condition. The exotic-animal definition covers nonindigenous game species, including axis deer, nilga antelope, red sheep, other cloven-hoofed ruminant mammals and qualifying exotic fowl. The incorporated fowl definition has its own exclusions, including nonindigenous birds on publicly owned land. It is not an exemption for anything a seller casually calls “exotic.” Tax Code 23.51; game-animal definition; exotic-fowl definition.
What it does not change. This is a tax rule for the animals, not a general exemption for hunting trips, licenses, equipment or every ranch expense. Existing agricultural exemptions and their conditions remain separate. The law also does not authorize possession or sale that wildlife law otherwise prohibits. Although Section 151.316 begins with a reference to the agricultural-registration rule, Section 151.1551’s listed registration-number categories do not include these new animal paragraphs; HB135 does not add them to that list. Final law; registration provision; existing game-animal possession rule.
The bill received the votes for immediate effect and became law May 13, 2025. It expressly preserves tax liability that accrued before that date, including collection and civil/criminal enforcement under prior law; it does not wipe out old tax debts or create a retroactive refund entitlement. Final law, Sections 2–3; history.
What changed along the way?
The House committee substitute reversed the order of the two added categories and changed “game animals, as defined” to “game animals, as described” by the Parks and Wildlife section. The intended categories remained the same. The House committee, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled versions then retained the same policy text. The official amendment index lists no floor amendments; the substitute should not be confused with a floor amendment. Introduced text; House substitute; all versions; amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Potential benefits: buyers and sellers of qualifying animals gain clearer statutory tax treatment. Because the comptroller already commonly treated game-animal sales as exempt food-animal sales, the bill does not imply that every purchaser newly saves a tax that was previously being charged.
Limits and burdens: sellers still need to distinguish qualifying animals from other transactions; unrelated wildlife and tax rules remain. The exemption does not guarantee lower market prices or eliminate taxes owed before its effective date.
Fiscal estimate: the April 19 engrossed note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal implication, specifically because the bill codifies common industry and comptroller practice. The introduced and House committee fiscal notes use the same rationale. No particular revenue loss or per-animal savings amount is estimated, and the bill makes no appropriation. Latest fiscal note.
Review boundary: checked history, final text, all five versions, the no-amendment index, three fiscal notes and the incorporated animal/registration definitions. No individual purchase, seller’s tax records or wildlife permit was audited.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.