2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB140
HB140 creates a child protective investigations advisory committee within the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
Official caption: Relating to advisory bodies for the Department of Family and Protective Services, including the creation of the child protective investigations advisory committee and the abolition of the Family and Protective Services Council.
Official report lists House author(s): Noble. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB140 creates a child protective investigations advisory committee within the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
- Its scope is specific: The committee focuses on child investigations relating to parents, guardians, conservators, foster parents, family or household members, and people with whom a parent cohabits—the categories incorporated from Family Code 261.001(5)(A)–(C).
- Membership combines public appointees of statewide legislative/executive leaders, investigative staff from rural and urban regions, a district judge, a parent or caregiver with case experience, and four additional members selected with consideration of specified legal, family, foster-care and related experience.
- Public access has limits: The committee meets quarterly, with a public-comment period at least once a year.
- Two different start dates: the new committee provision took effect September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
HB140 creates a child protective investigations advisory committee within the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS). It advises on consistent investigative practices, staff training, legal compliance, due process, communication with lawyers and courts, and problems identified through data and public input. It does not create an appeals court or authorize the committee to overturn a family’s case outcome. Final law.
Its scope is specific. The committee focuses on child investigations relating to parents, guardians, conservators, foster parents, family or household members, and people with whom a parent cohabits—the categories incorporated from Family Code 261.001(5)(A)–(C). It is not the child-and-adult investigations committee proposed in the original bill. Final law, Section 40.031(a); incorporated definition.
Membership combines public appointees of statewide legislative/executive leaders, investigative staff from rural and urban regions, a district judge, a parent or caregiver with case experience, and four additional members selected with consideration of specified legal, family, foster-care and related experience. DFPS employees are nonvoting members. Members must step aside from recommendations directly involving their own cases; specified appointees also face employment, contract and close-family restrictions, with the law’s stated personnel exceptions. Final membership rules.
Public access has limits. The committee meets quarterly, with a public-comment period at least once a year. Open-meetings law applies, but case discussions may be closed under its procedures, and case-review-only meetings still require public notice. DFPS must provide a random sample of closed investigations stripped of identifying details such as names, addresses and birth dates. Investigation information and committee work product are confidential. A public annual report, due September 30, must include statewide and regional statistics for the preceding two state fiscal years, investigative challenges and recommendations. The figures cover investigations, dispositions, removals and services, staffing/workloads, timing, reviews and complaints. Final law, Section 40.031(h)–(l).
Two different start dates: the new committee provision took effect September 1, 2025. Abolition of the older, broader Family and Protective Services Council and related cleanup provisions took effect September 1, 2026. The old council’s appointment, training, term, reimbursement and meeting statutes were repealed; the bill did not abolish DFPS itself or end its efficiency audits. It retained the commissioner’s duty to offer a hearing when requested by at least 25 people, a governmental entity, or an association with at least 25 members, removing the link to old-council recommendations. The new committee is scheduled to expire September 1, 2029. Final law, Sections 1–8; official history.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee and engrossed texts had the same policy: a child-and-adult investigations committee. The Senate substitute narrowed it to child investigations, added the old council’s abolition, revised membership and made DFPS staff nonvoting. It added anonymized closed-case sampling and confidentiality rules. It replaced public testimony at every meeting and mandatory livestreaming/seven-year archives with the final public-comment and meeting provisions, and moved the annual report deadline from August 31 to September 30. The original livestreaming requirement is not in the enacted bill. Introduced text; Senate substitute; all versions.
The index lists no separate floor amendments, but the adopted Senate substitute substantially changed the bill. Both chambers also approved HCR156, instructing the enrolling clerk to strike the Senate text’s Section 2, an amendment to Government Code 531.0012(c), and renumber the remaining sections. The enrolled text reflects that correction; the separate amendment to Section 521.0003(c) remains. Amendment index; Senate packet; correction resolution.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Potential benefits: children and families could benefit from more consistent investigations and greater attention to due process; investigators gain a forum for identifying training and coordination problems. Regional reporting may help lawmakers spot problems. Recommendations do not guarantee a different result in any individual case.
Trade-offs: the new body has a narrower remit than the abolished council, and confidentiality limits public access to its underlying case work. Public comment is required at least annually, not at every meeting as originally proposed. DFPS must supply staff support, protect identities, prepare data and respond to the advisory process.
Fiscal estimate: the latest May 9 note anticipates no significant state fiscal impact because costs are assumed absorbable within existing resources, and no local-government fiscal impact. That is not a finding of zero staff workload or guaranteed savings. HB140 makes no appropriation. Earlier fiscal notes describing adult investigations and livestreaming concern versions that did not become law. Latest fiscal note.
Review boundary: checked full text, history, all versions, the amendment index and complete Senate packet, the correction resolution, all five listed fiscal notes and the old-council provisions being repealed. Current appointments, meeting practices and individual child-protection cases were not audited.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.