2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB1445

HB1445 allows the director's designee in a county's managed assigned counsel program to receive, approve or reduce appointed lawyers' payment requests.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the compensation of counsel appointed to provide representation and services to indigent individuals in criminal and juvenile proceedings.

Became law without signatureSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Hernandez, Schofield. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB1445 allows the director’s designee in a county’s managed assigned counsel program to receive, approve or reduce appointed lawyers’ payment requests. Previously, the relevant payment provision named the program director, not a designee. This is an administrative delegation change—not a new statewide pay rate, automatic fee increase or requirement that every county create such a program. Final law

Managed assigned counsel programs arrange publicly funded legal representation through appointed attorneys. The existing framework covers criminal cases and can include juvenile cases. Counties without this program continue using the presiding judge under this provision. Code of Criminal Procedure 26.047 and 26.05 · Family Code 51.10, including juvenile appointed-counsel compensation

The designee must follow the same safeguards as the judge or director: itemized services must be submitted and payment approved; a reduction requires written findings identifying the approved amount and each reason for the difference. The existing right to seek review from the administrative region’s presiding judge remains when a request is disapproved or has not been acted on by the 60th day. Local fee schedules, payment obligations and review procedures are not replaced by this delegation.

The act took effect September 1, 2025, and applies only to attorney expenses incurred on or after that date. The trigger is when the expenses were incurred, not simply when an older claim was submitted.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled operative texts are identical. The official amendment index expressly reports no amendments. There was no committee substitute or floor amendment changing the policy. Introduced · House committee · Engrossed · Senate committee · Version index · Amendment index

HB1445 became law without the governor’s signature, filed June 20, 2025. It passed the House 143–1, with one present but not voting, and the Senate 31–0. It should not be described as a bill the governor signed. Official history

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Program directors gain flexibility to share payment-review work, and appointed lawyers may benefit if delegation reduces bottlenecks. Counties remain responsible for payments under the existing framework; designees take on documentation and review duties. Faster processing is a possible benefit, not a measured result established by the act.

Both Legislative Budget Board fiscal notes anticipate no significant state or local fiscal impact, with state costs absorbable using existing resources. They supply no quantified two-year or five-year cost estimate. The criminal-justice impact statement identifies no new felony, enhanced felony punishment or change to release eligibility and expects no significant correctional impact. Introduced fiscal note · Engrossed fiscal note · Criminal-justice impact statement

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.