2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB1465

HB1465 expands the location-based part of Texas's invasive visual recording offense.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the prosecution of the criminal offense of invasive visual recording and the applicability of sex offender registration requirements to that offense.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Hickland, Bowers, Louderback, Gámez, Cook. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB1465 expands the location-based part of Texas’s invasive visual recording offense. Instead of naming only bathrooms and changing rooms, the law covers a place where a reasonable person would believe they could undress privately without being photographed, recorded, broadcast or transmitted. Bathrooms, bedrooms and changing rooms are expressly included, but the definition is not limited to that list. Final law

The offense still requires lack of the other person’s consent and intent to invade that person’s privacy. It also covers knowingly promoting the qualifying images or recordings. The separate provision protecting intimate areas from recording when they are reasonably expected not to be publicly visible remains. This is not a blanket ban on every photograph taken indoors. Existing law also says a posted recording notice alone is insufficient to establish consent for the protected-place provision. Penal Code 21.15

The offense remains a state-jail felony, ordinarily punishable by 180 days–two years and a possible fine up to $10,000, subject to applicable enhancement rules. HB1465 expands its reach and consequences rather than increasing that base penalty category. Penalty framework

The act adds invasive visual recording to reportable convictions/adjudications for sex-offender registration, including qualifying deferred adjudications and juvenile adjudications. Adding it to the list also affects linked provisions for specified attempts, conspiracies, solicitations, burglaries and substantially similar out-of-state offenses; their additional statutory conditions still apply.

Registration is not automatically for life merely because of this addition. For an ordinary adult conviction or deferred adjudication falling under Article 62.101(c), the period generally extends ten years beyond the latest applicable release, discharge or dismissal-and-discharge date—not simply ten years from conviction. Juvenile dispositions and other registration grounds or relief provisions can change the result. Registration law, including Articles 62.001, 62.051, 62.101 and juvenile provisions

The act took effect September 1, 2025 and applies only to offenses committed on or after that date. If any element occurred before then, prior law governs. The act does not automatically impose its new registration consequence on every older recording conviction.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill already proposed the broader privacy-place definition and registration consequence. The House committee substitute expressly added “bedroom” to the examples in the definition. House committee, engrossed, Senate committee and final operative text match. The official amendment index reports no amendments; the bedroom addition occurred in the substitute, not a floor amendment. Introduced · House substitute · Engrossed · Senate committee · Version index · Amendment index

Governor Abbott signed HB1465 May 29, 2025. Final passage was 136–0 in the House, with one present but not voting, and 31–0 in the Senate. Official history

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

People recorded in private spaces beyond the previously named locations gain clearer statutory protection. Prosecutors gain broader coverage, while affected defendants face registration obligations as well as the existing felony penalty. Local law enforcement and supervision agencies may have additional registration and enforcement work. The act does not quantify deterrence or a reduction in privacy violations.

All three Legislative Budget Board fiscal notes anticipate no significant state fiscal impact and assume no significant local enforcement, prosecution, supervision or confinement impact. The criminal-justice statements acknowledge possible additional correctional demands but assume those effects will not be significant. They provide no quantified two-year/five-year cost estimate. Their fiscal-2024 case counts describe the preexisting offense, not measured effects of HB1465. Introduced fiscal note · Substitute fiscal note · Engrossed fiscal note · Latest criminal-justice impact statement

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.