← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB1481
HB1481 requires school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to adopt, implement and comply with a written policy prohibiting student use of personal communication devices on school property during the school day, subject…
Official caption: Relating to school district and open-enrollment charter school policies regarding student use of personal communication devices.
Official report lists House author(s): Fairly, Patterson, Talarico, Buckley, Johnson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB1481 requires school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to adopt, implement and comply with a written policy prohibiting student use of personal communication devices on school property during the school day, subject to required exceptions.
- Covered devices include smartphones, flip phones, tablets, smartwatches, radios, pagers and other electronic devices capable of telecommunication or digital communication.
- Schools can prohibit students from bringing covered devices onto school property or designate a storage method during the school day.
- These are required exceptions, not optional favors.
- A policy may allow disposal of a confiscated device only after giving the student's parent 90 days' prior written notice.
- The law took effect June 20, 2025, on signature, because it received the required votes for immediate effect.
What does it do?
HB1481 requires school districts and open-enrollment charter schools to adopt, implement and comply with a written policy prohibiting student use of personal communication devices on school property during the school day, subject to required exceptions. It is broader than a classroom-only or instructional-time rule. Schools must establish disciplinary measures and may confiscate devices. Final law
Covered devices include smartphones, flip phones, tablets, smartwatches, radios, pagers and other electronic devices capable of telecommunication or digital communication. Devices provided to students by the district or charter school are excluded from this definition. The section does not apply to adult-education programs operated under the specified charter authority.
Schools can prohibit students from bringing covered devices onto school property or designate a storage method during the school day. The act does not require a particular brand of locking pouch, nor does it itself make every instance of possession a statewide violation. Local policy determines how permitted possession and storage work.
Policies must allow use:
- Necessary to implement an individualized education program, a Section 504 plan or a similar program or plan.
- For a student’s documented need based on a qualified physician’s directive.
- Necessary to comply with a legal health/safety requirement or the school’s safety protocols.
These are required exceptions, not optional favors. The act does not create an unrestricted parent-request or classroom-instruction exception for every personally owned phone or laptop.
A policy may allow disposal of a confiscated device only after giving the student’s parent 90 days’ prior written notice. HB1481 removes the section’s prior express authority to charge an administrative retrieval fee of up to $15. It does not establish a new statewide confiscation fee or specify a uniform suspension schedule.
The law took effect June 20, 2025, on signature, because it received the required votes for immediate effect. Schools had to adopt policies as soon as practicable and no later than September 18, 2025. TEA was required to publish model language and issued implementation guidance. TEA’s July 31, 2025 implementation notice
TEA’s model document offers choices for school-day/property definitions, storage, discipline and communication with families. Those sample choices are not all mandatory statutory rules. Its discussion of personally owned instructional laptops/tablets calls for careful technology and legal review, not an automatic bring-your-own-device exemption. Parents should check their school’s adopted policy for practical procedures. TEA guidance and model language
What changed along the way?
The introduced bill proposed an instructional-time ban and required classrooms to designate a secure, out-of-sight storage area. The House substitute instead rewrote the existing paging-device law: it broadened the rule to the school day on school property, supplied required exceptions, gave local possession/storage options, revised confiscation/disposal rules, required TEA model language and added the 90-day adoption deadline. The enacted law does not retain the introduced universal classroom-storage mandate. Introduced · House substitute
House substitute, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled operative texts match. The official amendment index expressly reports no amendments; the changes came through the substitute. The bill passed the House 128–17, with two present but not voting, and Senate 31–0, and Governor Abbott signed it June 20. Engrossed · Senate committee · Version index · Amendment index · Official history
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Students and teachers may benefit from fewer device-related distractions. Families lose some direct school-day communication options and need clear emergency/contact procedures. Schools must manage storage, enforcement, required exceptions and any technology changes. The law itself does not measure improvements in learning, behavior or mental health.
The introduced fiscal note identified unquantified local storage-container costs. The later substitute and engrossed notes anticipated no significant state or local fiscal impact, with state work absorbable using existing resources; they provide no quantified two-year/five-year estimate. Introduced fiscal note · Substitute fiscal note · Engrossed fiscal note
Separately, TEA’s July 31, 2025 notice reported $20 million in state implementation-grant funding for storage and related infrastructure, with ranked awards and limited funding. That was an implementation funding announcement—not an appropriation written into HB1481’s three sections, a guarantee that every school receives its full costs, or a claim that the 2025 application window remains open.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.