2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB1533
HB1533 changes several parts of Texas's property-tax appraisal and appeal system.
Official caption: Relating to the system for appraising property for ad valorem tax purposes.
Official report lists House author(s): Button, Noble, Turner, Bell, Keith. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB1533 changes several parts of Texas's property-tax appraisal and appeal system.
- Notices and records: Notice concerning property omitted from a prior year's appraisal roll must be sent by certified mail.
- Protest hearings: A property owner without a designated agent may elect telephone or video participation in the protest notice or by written notice filed at least five days before the hearing.
- Tenant arbitration: A tenant contractually required to reimburse the owner for property taxes can use binding arbitration to challenge an appraisal review board's determination of appraised or market value of $5 million or less.
- Court appeals: Courts cannot order discovery—the exchange of evidence—unless a party requests it.
- Board-member training: If the comptroller hires a service provider to help with the specified appraisal review board training courses, at least one trainer must be a taxpayer representative.
What does it do?
HB1533 changes several parts of Texas’s property-tax appraisal and appeal system. Most changes took effect September 1, 2025, with separate January 1, 2026 start dates for training courses and the new tenant-arbitration right. It does not set a tax rate or guarantee a lower appraisal. Final law
Notices and records: Notice concerning property omitted from a prior year’s appraisal roll must be sent by certified mail. This is a targeted requirement, not a certified-mail rule for every appraisal notice. Appraisal districts in counties with 120,000 or more residents must maintain a website and post completed appraisal records, excluding legally confidential information, updating them at least weekly for appraisal-value changes. The law also removes the requirement that an agent supply the signing computer’s IP address when a chief appraiser requests information about an electronically submitted agent designation; signature information and signing date remain required.
Protest hearings: A property owner without a designated agent may elect telephone or video participation in the protest notice or by written notice filed at least five days before the hearing. An owner represented by a designated agent still faces the 10-day deadline. If an appraisal review board dismisses a protest for lack of jurisdiction, it must notify the owner in writing and explain the grounds. Notice of the good-cause hearing required before issuing a subpoena increases from five to 15 days, and the person being subpoenaed must have an opportunity to be heard.
Tenant arbitration: A tenant contractually required to reimburse the owner for property taxes can use binding arbitration to challenge an appraisal review board’s determination of appraised or market value of $5 million or less. The underlying protest must have been brought by the tenant under the applicable tenant-protest law, or by the owner if the owner does not appeal. This is an alternative to court appeal, not a right for every renter to pursue duplicate proceedings. The tenant is treated as the owner for the appeal, and the comptroller must send notices to both. Existing arbitration filing and deposit requirements still apply; arbitration is not automatically free. Arbitration law, including Sections 41A.011 and 41A.03
Court appeals: Courts cannot order discovery—the exchange of evidence—unless a party requests it. They cannot impose expert-witness discovery deadlines earlier than the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, or otherwise accelerate expert discovery without the parties’ agreement.
Board-member training: If the comptroller hires a service provider to help with the specified appraisal review board training courses, at least one trainer must be a taxpayer representative. Ordinarily that trainer must be a Texas resident and Texas lawyer with at least five years’ practice and property-tax experience, with no prior representation of an appraisal district, review board or taxing unit, no prior appraisal-district employment/officer service, and no prior review-board membership. If no qualifying applicant applies, the comptroller may instead choose a Texas resident with a bachelor’s degree and property-tax knowledge/experience who does not currently hold the listed appraisal-district, review-board or taxing-unit positions. This fallback is not an unrestricted waiver.
The act preserves earlier law for agent-information requests, protest notices, subpoenas and court appeals made, filed or issued before September 1, 2025, as specified in its transition sections. The training requirement applies to courses provided on or after January 1, 2026; the tenant-arbitration provision applies to requests filed on or after that date. Final law, Sections 11–17 · Supplemental appraisal records and notices
What changed along the way?
The House substitute narrowed the five-day remote-hearing election to owners without agents, limited the training provision to contracted assistance and added the fallback trainer, specified completed appraisal records, and changed jurisdictional-dismissal language from a written order to written notification. It also removed the introduced proposal to expand limited binding arbitration over the use of corrected comparable-property values. That removed proposal is not part of this law. The substitute refined effective-date transitions; House substitute, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled operative texts match. Introduced · House substitute · Engrossed · Senate committee · All versions
Both Little floor amendments were tabled on May 13. Amendment 1 would have broadened the nonprofit-community-business-organization definition by removing the statewide-organization exclusion and restrictions on forming or financially supporting political committees. Amendment 2 would have changed property-tax refund-address requests, added a comptroller form and false-statement warning, and allowed revocation. Neither was enacted through HB1533. Amendment 1 · Amendment 2 · Amendment dispositions
Governor Abbott signed HB1533 June 20, 2025. It passed the House 126–12, with two present but not voting, and the Senate 31–0. Official history
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Property owners gain clearer notices, easier access to completed appraisal records in larger counties and more time to elect remote participation when unrepresented. Eligible tax-paying tenants gain an arbitration route. Districts and the comptroller must handle records, training and appeals; taxpayers using arbitration still face existing deposits and potential costs, and success is not guaranteed.
The introduced fiscal note anticipated no significant state impact. The later House-substitute and engrossed notes instead estimate $770,000 in state General Revenue costs for fiscal years 2026–27, or $385,000 annually in each of 2026–2030—$1.925 million over five years. They assume four additional full-time staff and include $50,000 annually for a qualifying taxpayer-representative trainer contract. No significant local-government fiscal impact is anticipated. These are estimates, not an appropriation in the act. Introduced fiscal note · Substitute fiscal note · Engrossed fiscal note
The fiscal notes’ narrative describes some provisions more broadly than the enacted text, including “continuously” updating records and expanded limited-arbitration grounds. This briefing follows the final law’s at-least-weekly standard and does not treat the removed limited-arbitration proposal as enacted.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.