← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB1633
HB1633 expressly adds registered, permit-exempt wells to the interests a groundwater conservation district must consider when reviewing a permit or qualifying permit amendment.
Official caption: Relating to the criteria considered by groundwater conservation districts before granting or denying a permit or permit amendment.
Official report lists House author(s): Gerdes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB1633 expressly adds registered, permit-exempt wells to the interests a groundwater conservation district must consider when reviewing a permit or qualifying permit amendment.
- Both conditions matter: a well must be registered with the district and exempt from a permit requirement under state law or district rules.
- The change is a required consideration, not an automatic veto for a neighboring well owner, a ban on new wells, or a guarantee that every existing well's water level will remain unchanged.
- The amended subsection expressly does not apply to operating-permit renewals under Water Code 36.1145.
What does it do?
HB1633 expressly adds registered, permit-exempt wells to the interests a groundwater conservation district must consider when reviewing a permit or qualifying permit amendment. The district must consider whether the proposed water use would unreasonably affect those wells, alongside the existing considerations for groundwater and surface-water resources and existing permit holders. It took effect June 20, 2025. Final law; history.
Both conditions matter: a well must be registered with the district and exempt from a permit requirement under state law or district rules. Exemption is not the same as having no relationship with the district. Water Code 36.117 separately requires well registration under district rules and sets out exemptions, including certain domestic and livestock wells subject to acreage, capacity and use conditions. HB1633 does not rewrite those exemption qualifications or require every exempt well to obtain a permit. Water Code 36.117.
The change is a required consideration, not an automatic veto for a neighboring well owner, a ban on new wells, or a guarantee that every existing well’s water level will remain unchanged. The district still applies the other statutory criteria, including beneficial use, consistency with its management plan, avoiding waste and protecting groundwater quality. Final law, Section 1.
The amended subsection expressly does not apply to operating-permit renewals under Water Code 36.1145. A requested change requiring a permit amendment is governed separately by 36.1146; the bill should not be described as reopening every routine renewal. Water Code 36.113, 36.1145 and 36.1146.
What changed along the way?
The official amendment index states the bill has no amendments. The introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions have identical operative text. The final change retains the existing criteria and adds registered, exempt wells to the unreasonable-effects inquiry; no floor amendment or conference rewrite altered that approach. Versions; amendments; history.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Owners relying on registered exempt wells could benefit from explicit consideration of their wells before nearby permitted water uses are approved. Applicants and districts may need to address those effects in permit reviews. The law does not specify a guaranteed outcome, compensation payment or new study fee, and the financial effects of an individual permitting decision will depend on the facts.
The May 1, 2025 fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal impact and no significant local-government fiscal impact. It provides no dollar estimate or quantified two-year or five-year forecast, and does not estimate private applicants’ costs or the value of protected water supplies.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.