2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB166
HB166 adds substances in Texas Penalty Group 1-B—including fentanyl and specified related opioids—to the drug-related circumstances that can support a legal presumption of imminent danger in an endangerment prosecution.
Official caption: Relating to committing the criminal offense of endangering a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual by engaging in certain conduct involving a controlled substance listed in Penalty Group 1-B of the Texas Controlled Substances Act.
Official report lists House author(s): Capriglione. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB166 adds substances in Texas Penalty Group 1-B—including fentanyl and specified related opioids—to the drug-related circumstances that can support a legal presumption of imminent danger in an endangerment prosecution.
- The underlying offense still requires intentional, knowing, reckless or criminally negligent conduct placing a protected person in imminent danger of death, bodily injury, or physical or mental impairment.
- A presumption is not a mandatory guilty verdict.
- The endangerment offense remains a state jail felony.
What does it do?
HB166 adds substances in Texas Penalty Group 1-B—including fentanyl and specified related opioids—to the drug-related circumstances that can support a legal presumption of imminent danger in an endangerment prosecution. It changes an evidentiary rule within the existing offense, rather than making every instance of drug possession an automatic endangerment conviction. The law took effect September 1, 2025. Final act · Penalty Group 1-B
The three circumstances now cover:
- Manufacturing, possessing or introducing a Penalty Group 1-B substance into anyone’s body in the presence of a child, elderly individual or disabled individual, alongside the existing methamphetamine provision.
- Conduct involving the proximity or accessibility of such a substance to the protected person, together with a test of that person’s blood, urine or other bodily substance showing its presence, alongside the existing methamphetamine provision.
- Introducing a Penalty Group 1-B substance into the human body when the actor was not in lawful possession of it, alongside the existing Penalty Group 1 provision. The express unlawful-possession condition belongs to this third circumstance; HB166 does not repeat it in the other two. Section 1
The underlying offense still requires intentional, knowing, reckless or criminally negligent conduct placing a protected person in imminent danger of death, bodily injury, or physical or mental impairment. For this offense, a child is 14 or younger and an elderly individual is 65 or older; “disabled individual” has a specific statutory definition covering listed conditions and certain substantial limitations in self-protection or self-care. Penal Code Sections 22.041 and 22.04(c)
A presumption is not a mandatory guilty verdict. Under the Penal Code’s general rule, the facts supporting it must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury may—but need not—find the presumed element, and the state must still prove every other element beyond a reasonable doubt. Penal Code Section 2.05(a)
The endangerment offense remains a state jail felony. Its ordinary statutory punishment range is 180 days to two years in state jail, with a possible fine up to $10,000; separate enhancement rules can affect punishment. HB166 does not change that classification or range. Its changes apply only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025; if any element occurred before then, the former law governs. Section 22.041(f) · Section 12.35 · Final act, Sections 2–3
What changed along the way?
The filed bill already contained all three Penalty Group 1-B additions, the prospective-only application provision and the September 1 effective date. Comparing the filed, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled texts shows no substantive change to those three sections. Both committees reported it without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. Filed text · House report · House-passed text · Senate report · Amendment index
The House passed HB166 April 30 by 140–1, with two present but not voting. The Senate passed it May 9 by 30–1. The governor signed it May 24. Vote certificates · Official history
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Children, older adults and people within the disability definition could benefit if the expanded evidentiary rule helps authorities address dangerous exposure to fentanyl-related drugs. Prosecutors gain an additional statutory route for establishing the danger element. These are potential effects of the legal change, not measured reductions in exposure, injuries or deaths. Final act
Defendants may face greater exposure to endangerment charges when the specified facts are present, although the prosecution’s burden and the jury’s discretion remain. Courts, prosecutors, supervision agencies and confinement facilities may bear additional case-related costs. The Legislative Budget Board anticipated no significant state fiscal implication and assumed local enforcement, prosecution, supervision and confinement impacts would not be significant. Any state revenue effect would depend on offenses and related court costs; the note did not provide a forecast of additional convictions. Latest posted fiscal note, May 2 · Presumption safeguards
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.