2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB1689
HB1689 expressly allows a groundwater conservation district to use specified export-fee increase revenue to keep significantly affected wells operating even when those wells are outside the district.
Official caption: Relating to the use of certain groundwater export fees collected by a groundwater conservation district.
Official report lists House author(s): Gerdes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB1689 expressly allows a groundwater conservation district to use specified export-fee increase revenue to keep significantly affected wells operating even when those wells are outside the district.
- The provision concerns money from increases in export fees under Water Code 36.122(e-1) on or after January 1, 2024, not all district revenue.
- If an affected well is in another groundwater conservation district, spending this money to maintain the well's operation requires an interlocal contract with that other district authorizing that use.
- The existing permitted uses of this restricted revenue—alternative water supplies, aquifer monitoring, data collection and aquifer science—remain.
What does it do?
HB1689 expressly allows a groundwater conservation district to use specified export-fee increase revenue to keep significantly affected wells operating even when those wells are outside the district. It took effect September 1, 2025. The money remains restricted to assessing and addressing impacts associated with groundwater development; this is not unrestricted authority to spend district money anywhere. Final law.
The provision concerns money from increases in export fees under Water Code 36.122(e-1) on or after January 1, 2024, not all district revenue. That earlier provision increases the allowable fee ceiling by three percent each calendar year. HB1689 does not itself impose a new fee or order a district to raise its fee. Existing law requires board approval after a public hearing for the covered fee or fee increase. Water Code 36.122(e)–(e-3) and 36.207.
If an affected well is in another groundwater conservation district, spending this money to maintain the well’s operation requires an interlocal contract with that other district authorizing that use. In plain terms, the districts must formally agree; one district cannot simply bypass the other district under this provision. The new contract condition specifically addresses wells in another district, not every well outside the spending district’s boundary. Final law, new 36.207(c); Government Code Chapter 791.
The existing permitted uses of this restricted revenue—alternative water supplies, aquifer monitoring, data collection and aquifer science—remain. The law says a district may use the funds; it does not guarantee a payment or repair to every owner whose well is affected. Final law.
What changed along the way?
The official amendment index says the bill has no amendments. Its introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions have identical operative text. The final law retains both the outside-district clarification and the agreement requirement for wells located in another district. There was no floor amendment or conference rewrite. Versions; amendments; history.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Owners of wells significantly affected by groundwater development could benefit when the impacts cross district boundaries and the relevant district chooses to fund assistance. Districts gain an explicit way to address those effects cooperatively. Money used for an outside well will not simultaneously be available for other eligible projects, and districts must arrange the required agreement where another district is involved.
The May 1, 2025 fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal impact and no significant local-government fiscal impact. It gives no dollar estimate or quantified two-year or five-year forecast. The bill provides neither a statewide appropriation nor a guaranteed individual award amount.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.