2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB1950
HB1950 creates a consolidated municipal court building security and technology fund for municipalities with fewer than 100,000 residents.
Official caption: Relating to the consolidated municipal court security and technology fund in certain municipalities.
Official report lists House author(s): Capriglione. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB1950 creates a consolidated municipal court building security and technology fund for municipalities with fewer than 100,000 residents.
- The consolidated fund receives the security and technology allocations from the existing local court cost for a nonjailable misdemeanor conviction.
- Money remains restricted to the purposes cross-referenced in Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 102.017(b)–(c) and 102.0172(b): court-building security personnel, services and equipment, and court technology purchases or maintenance.
- The bill passed with the votes required for immediate effect and became law May 29, 2025.
What does it do?
HB1950 creates a consolidated municipal court building security and technology fund for municipalities with fewer than 100,000 residents. These municipalities are excluded from the prior separate-fund articles. Municipalities at or above 100,000 residents are not covered by the new consolidated-fund provision. The city governing body administers the new fund or directs its administration. Final law, Sections 1–3.
The consolidated fund receives the security and technology allocations from the existing local court cost for a nonjailable misdemeanor conviction. HB1950 does not increase that $14 court cost. It redirects the existing minimum shares—35% for security and 28.5714% for technology—to the consolidated fund where applicable. The 35.7143% youth-diversion and 0.7143% jury-fund shares remain in the allocation statute. These are portions of that court cost, not percentages of all fines or city revenue. Final law, Section 4; Local Government Code 134.103.
Money remains restricted to the purposes cross-referenced in Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 102.017(b)–(c) and 102.0172(b): court-building security personnel, services and equipment, and court technology purchases or maintenance. Examples include security screening equipment, eligible security personnel, computer systems and docket-management systems. Consolidation does not turn the money into unrestricted city revenue. Code of Criminal Procedure 102.017, 102.0172 and 102.0175.
The bill passed with the votes required for immediate effect and became law May 29, 2025. The changes apply only to conviction fees collected on or after that date. Fees collected earlier remain governed by the former law; the act does not authorize treating every previously collected balance as new consolidated-fund money. Final law, Sections 5–6 and vote certifications; history.
What changed along the way?
All five versions retain the same population threshold, fund structure, allocation percentages, restricted purposes and collection-date transition. The enrolled text makes minor wording corrections, including “that purpose” instead of “what purpose” in the transition clause and “a vote of” in the immediate-effect clause. The official amendment index reports no amendments; no floor-amendment policy change is shown. Versions; amendment index; final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Eligible cities and municipal courts gain flexibility to use a combined pool for authorized security or technology needs. Court users and staff may benefit from funded improvements, but the bill does not promise particular purchases. City treasurers must apply the new accounting and collection-date rules. People paying the existing court cost receive no reduction from this bill, but it does not raise that charge either.
The May 2, 2025 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact, assuming any costs can be absorbed within existing resources. It provides no quantified savings or separate two-year or five-year dollar forecast.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.