2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2018

HB2018 makes agricultural or timber use and productivity explicit considerations in the Texas Farm and Ranch Lands Conservation Program.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the Texas Farm and Ranch Lands Conservation Program.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Ashby, Flores. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2018 makes agricultural or timber use and productivity explicit considerations in the Texas Farm and Ranch Lands Conservation Program. The program helps purchase conservation easements from willing sellers. An easement leaves ownership with the landowner while placing agreed limits or duties on use of the property for conservation purposes; this is not a law requiring every farm or timber tract to enter the program. Parks and Wildlife Code 84.002–84.003; Natural Resources Code 183.001.

The revised definition requires an agricultural conservation easement to be designed to maintain the land’s agricultural or timber use, as well as accomplish at least one listed conservation purpose: water quality or quantity, native wildlife habitat, rare or sensitive plants, or large open-space tracts threatened by development or fragmentation. The program council’s authority to ensure consistency of purchased easements now expressly includes maintaining agricultural or timber use and conserving wildlife habitat or water, alongside preserving open space. Final law, Sections 1–2.

For grant awards, the council must give priority to applications protecting and maintaining the agricultural or timber productivity of land susceptible to development, subdivision or fragmentation. Agricultural or timber productivity also becomes an express scoring consideration. Other listed factors remain: landscape and watershed integrity, native habitats, additional public or private funding, proximity to protected land, the easement’s perpetual or 30-year term, and an agreed resource-management plan approved by the council. Productivity is a consideration, not an automatic grant entitlement. Final law, Section 3.

The changes took effect September 1, 2025. HB2018 does not set a new appropriation amount, award a particular property a grant or remove the program’s other land and applicant requirements. Final law.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill used “agricultural use potential” in key provisions and would have added agricultural productivity to scoring. The House committee substitute expressly added timber and used “agricultural or timber productivity” in the definition, council authority, priority and scoring language. Introduced text; House substitute.

The sole indexed floor amendment, House amendment 1 by Ashby, adopted April 29, replaced “productivity” with “use” in two places only: the easement definition and the council’s consistency provision. The grant-priority and scoring provisions still use productivity in the final law. The Senate committee and enrolled texts retained the House-passed result. Full amendment; amendment disposition; all versions; history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Landowners and conservation partners seeking to retain working farms, ranches or timberland gain clearer statutory recognition of those uses. The public may benefit when funded projects also protect water, habitats or threatened open space. Projects compete for available funding, and successful landowners accept the restrictions and obligations in their easements. The bill does not quantify acreage protected, grant amounts or financial returns to landowners.

The May 2, 2025 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal impact, assuming implementation within existing resources, and no local-government fiscal impact. It provides no separate two-year or five-year dollar forecast.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.