2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2073
HB2073 increases penalties when someone commits specified protective-order or bond-condition violations while possessing a deadly weapon.
Official caption: Relating to increasing the criminal penalty for certain violations of certain court orders or conditions of bond in cases involving family violence, child abuse or neglect, sexual assault or abuse, indecent assault, stalking, or trafficking.
Official report lists House author(s): Hull. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2073 increases penalties when someone commits specified protective-order or bond-condition violations while possessing a deadly weapon.
- The new state jail felony provision applies to violations described in Section 25.07(a)(1), (2), (3), (5), (6) or (7) while possessing a deadly weapon.
- The firearm-possession-only provision, Section 25.07(a)(4), is not in that new list.
- The separate repeated-violation offense involves two or more violations within 12 months or less; it is not simply a requirement for two prior convictions.
- Ordinary punishment ranges provide context: Class A misdemeanors carry up to one year in jail and/or a $4,000 fine; state jail felonies ordinarily carry 180 days to two years and a possible $10,000 fine; third-degree felonies ordinarily carry 2–10 years and second-degree felonies 2–20 years, each with a possible $10,000 fine.
- The changes apply only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
HB2073 increases penalties when someone commits specified protective-order or bond-condition violations while possessing a deadly weapon. It concerns the orders and safety-related bond conditions covered by Penal Code 25.07 in family-violence, child-abuse/neglect, sexual-assault/abuse, indecent-assault, stalking and trafficking cases—not every court order or every instance of possessing a weapon. Final law; underlying offenses.
The new state jail felony provision applies to violations described in Section 25.07(a)(1), (2), (3), (5), (6) or (7) while possessing a deadly weapon. Those provisions cover specified violence or acts furthering listed crimes, prohibited communications, going near protected places, interference with protected animals, GPS-monitor tampering and prohibited tracking or following. The underlying knowing-or-intentional violation requirements remain. “Deadly weapon” includes firearms and other items designed or used/intended for use to cause death or serious bodily injury. Final law, Section 1; Section 25.07(a); definition.
The firearm-possession-only provision, Section 25.07(a)(4), is not in that new list. Possessing a firearm in violation of a covered order may still be an offense, but HB2073 does not automatically convert that provision alone into the new weapon enhancement. Existing third-degree-felony treatment for specified repeat convictions or violations involving assault or stalking remains and takes priority over the state-jail tier. The separate preexisting state-jail provision for certain post-conviction/deferred-adjudication protective orders also remains. Final law, amended 25.07(g).
The separate repeated-violation offense involves two or more violations within 12 months or less; it is not simply a requirement for two prior convictions. HB2073 raises that offense from a third-degree to a second-degree felony when at least one instance is shown at trial to have been conduct punishable under the new weapon-related state-jail provision, Section 25.07(g)(1)(B). The precise cross-reference matters; not every repeated violation becomes second-degree. Final law, Section 2; Section 25.072.
Ordinary punishment ranges provide context: Class A misdemeanors carry up to one year in jail and/or a $4,000 fine; state jail felonies ordinarily carry 180 days to two years and a possible $10,000 fine; third-degree felonies ordinarily carry 2–10 years and second-degree felonies 2–20 years, each with a possible $10,000 fine. These are not a prediction of any defendant’s sentence. Other enhancement rules matter: Section 12.35(c), for example, requires third-degree punishment for a state jail felony when its separate deadly-weapon-use/exhibition or prior-conviction conditions are proved. Possession and use/exhibition are not interchangeable triggers. Penal Code punishment provisions.
The changes apply only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025. If any element occurred earlier, the act’s transition clause preserves the prior law for that offense. Final law, Sections 3–4.
What changed along the way?
Although the history records a House committee substitute, the published introduced, House committee and House-passed operative texts are identical. The Senate committee and enrolled versions retain the same substance; printing/certification differences do not create additional policy changes. The official index lists no amendments, and there was no conference. Introduced; House committee; all versions; amendment index.
The House passed the bill May 10 and the Senate May 26; the governor signed it June 20. The new changes are the weapon-related penalty tiers, not the creation of the entire protective-order offense. History; final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
People protected by qualifying orders may benefit from stronger consequences for dangerous violations. Deterrence and improved safety are possible aims, not outcomes established by the bill text. Defendants face greater criminal exposure; courts, prosecutors and correctional agencies may face additional work or confinement costs. Final law; criminal-justice impact statement.
The latest fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local fiscal impact, while noting that revenues and enforcement, supervision and confinement costs depend on the number of affected cases. The criminal-justice statement reports 6,765 arrests for the underlying violation category and 1,099 for repeated violations in fiscal 2024, but says the proportion meeting the bill’s new conditions is unknown. Those are historical totals for broader offenses—not a forecast of new felony cases or unique people. Fiscal note; impact statement.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.