2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2254
HB2254 expressly permits preferred-provider and exclusive-provider health plans to contract directly with qualifying primary-care physicians or groups for primary health care using fee-for-service payments, risk sharing, capitati…
Official caption: Relating to certain health care services contract arrangements entered into by insurers and health care providers.
Official report lists House author(s): Hull. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2254 expressly permits preferred-provider and exclusive-provider health plans to contract directly with qualifying primary-care physicians or groups for primary health care using fee-for-service payments, risk sharing, capitation, or combinations.
- The physician definition covers specialists in family medicine, general internal medicine or general pediatrics who provide first-contact care and take continuing responsibility for comprehensive care.
- Participation is optional.
- The contract must spell out important payment terms rather than leave them implicit.
- Other required terms address whether there will be a temporary payment rate while sufficient usage data are gathered; a stop-loss threshold, minimum monthly payment or physician-purchased stop-loss coverage; adjustments as patients enter or leave the assigned population; exclusion of catastrophic events from relevant cost calculations; and whether shared savings include all savings or only the amount above a threshold.
What does it do?
HB2254 expressly permits preferred-provider and exclusive-provider health plans to contract directly with qualifying primary-care physicians or groups for primary health care using fee-for-service payments, risk sharing, capitation, or combinations. Capitation means a predetermined payment for a defined set of covered services over a stated period, regardless of how many services are actually provided. A qualifying physician or group does not become an insurance business merely by entering this contract. The act does not authorize global capitation arrangements and prohibits either contracting party from subcontracting. Final law, new Insurance Code 1301.0065(b), (c), (g) and (h).
The physician definition covers specialists in family medicine, general internal medicine or general pediatrics who provide first-contact care and take continuing responsibility for comprehensive care. A qualifying group regularly delivers care through two or more primary-care physicians and is either physician-owned and operated or a qualifying freestanding clinic, center or office of a nonprofit health organization certified under Occupations Code 162.001(b). The law does not extend this particular permission to every kind of provider or nonprofit facility. Final law, Section 1301.0065(a).
Participation is optional. An insurer may not discriminate against a physician or group for declining, including by lowering its fee schedule for that reason or making participation a condition of network membership. A physician or group believing this protection was violated may complain to the Texas Department of Insurance. Contracts may not discourage medically necessary services or interfere with independent medical judgment. Final law, Section 1301.0065(d)–(f).
The contract must spell out important payment terms rather than leave them implicit. Where compensation depends on performance measures, it must identify the measures, their source, the calculation method and period, access to the financial and performance information used, and a reconsideration process. Patient assignment must favor the patient’s established physician, determined through prior exams or visits; without an established relationship, the patient chooses. Final law, Section 1301.0065(f)(2)(A)–(B).
Other required terms address whether there will be a temporary payment rate while sufficient usage data are gathered; a stop-loss threshold, minimum monthly payment or physician-purchased stop-loss coverage; adjustments as patients enter or leave the assigned population; exclusion of catastrophic events from relevant cost calculations; and whether shared savings include all savings or only the amount above a threshold. These are requirements to state whether those protections or methods apply, not guarantees that every contract will include them. For capitated payments, a material increase in services or a payer’s material change to benefits must trigger an opportunity for good-faith rate renegotiation, or fee-for-service reimbursement under the contractual schedule until a revised rate is agreed. Final law, Section 1301.0065(f)(2)(C)–(4).
What changed along the way?
The introduced and House committee texts are substantively identical. The official index lists one floor amendment: Representative Hull’s House second-reading amendment, adopted April 30, 2025. It inserted “primary” before “health care services” in the authorization, narrowing the wording to primary health care services. That word appears in the engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled texts; those later versions otherwise have the same substantive provisions. No rejected floor amendments are listed. Text-version index; amendment index; complete amendment; final law.
The bill adds a new section rather than replacing the existing requirement for insurers to arrange access to covered services. It took effect immediately on June 20, 2025; September 1 was only the fallback date if the required votes had not been obtained. Final law, Sections 1–2; official history.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Participating primary-care practices and insurers gain an explicit route to alternative payment arrangements. Practices may gain predictable payments or shared savings, but also bear financial risk when the agreed payment must cover more services than expected. Optional participation, nondiscrimination, transparent calculations, reconsideration and renegotiation provisions protect physicians; independent-medical-judgment and patient-assignment requirements protect patient interests. The act does not set payment amounts, promise lower premiums, require reduced patient bills or guarantee better clinical outcomes. Final law.
The Legislative Budget Board’s May 12, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal effect, assuming associated costs can be absorbed with existing resources. The March 25 introduced note reaches the same conclusion. Neither note estimates private contract profits, losses, compliance costs or patient savings. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.