HB2282

All five text versions—introduced, House committee, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled—contain the same substantive provisions. Only printing marks and certification material differ. The amendment index expressly lists no amendments, and both committees reported the bill without amendments. There are no indexed rejected amendment proposals to summarize. The enacted change is the $25 increase, with its offense-date transition rule; it does not raise every peace-officer service fee. Text versions; introduced text; amendment index; final law.

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Defendants to whom this fee applies face an additional $25 assessment. Public agencies may recover more of the cost of executing or processing the covered orders. The act does not itself appropriate money, change the underlying offense, or specify how much additional revenue will actually be collected. This explanation does not determine an individual defendant’s payment obligation or any relief available under other laws. Final law.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 19, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal implication. The Office of Court Administration expected a positive effect on state revenue, but the note assumes it would be insignificant and gives no dollar estimate or multiyear revenue total. The April 7 introduced note reaches the same conclusions. A separate criminal-justice impact statement anticipates no significant effect on state correctional populations or resources. These findings do not mean the $25 increase is insignificant to every person charged the fee. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note; criminal-justice impact.