2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2407
HB2407 changes two enhancement rules for failing to comply with sex-offender registration requirements.
Official caption: Relating to increasing the criminal penalty for the failure of certain sex offenders to comply with sex offender registration requirements.
Official report lists House author(s): Capriglione. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2407 changes two enhancement rules for failing to comply with sex-offender registration requirements.
- The two existing triggers remain: a previous conviction for a registration violation or an attempt to commit one; or fraudulent use of identifying information in violation of Penal Code 32.51 during the current violation or attempt.
- The base registration offense can be a state-jail, third-degree or second-degree felony under Article 62.102(b), depending on the applicable registration duty and verification requirement.
- The act applies only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025.
What does it do?
HB2407 changes two enhancement rules for failing to comply with sex-offender registration requirements. If the specified fact is proved at trial, the offense or attempted offense itself moves to the next highest offense category. Previously, the statute said its punishment increased to the punishment for the next highest degree of felony. The change therefore concerns offense classification, not merely substituting a larger fine or adding a fixed number of years. Final law, Section 1; full registration-offense statute.
The two existing triggers remain: a previous conviction for a registration violation or an attempt to commit one; or fraudulent use of identifying information in violation of Penal Code 32.51 during the current violation or attempt. The second trigger is not simply any inaccurate entry or forgotten update—it requires the specified fraudulent use. HB2407 does not create the underlying duty to register or change every violation into the same felony. Final law; identifying-information offense.
The base registration offense can be a state-jail, third-degree or second-degree felony under Article 62.102(b), depending on the applicable registration duty and verification requirement. The ordinary attempt rule generally places an attempt one category below the intended offense; an attempt at a state-jail felony is a Class A misdemeanor. The revised wording expressly raises an applicable attempted offense to the next category too. These rules do not supply one universal sentence: the facts, underlying category and other applicable sentencing rules matter. Registration-offense statute; attempt rule; felony categories.
The act applies only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025. If any element occurred before that date, the act treats the offense as pre-effective and preserves the former law. A later trial date alone does not bring an earlier offense under the new rule. Final law, Sections 2–3; official history.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee and engrossed texts contain the same substantive provisions. The Senate committee and enrolled versions differ only in printing and certification material, not the enhancement rules or effective-date transition. The bill was reported without amendments in both chambers, and the amendment index lists none. There was no committee-substitute policy change to summarize. Introduced text; House committee text; text versions; amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The change gives prosecutors an offense-category enhancement when a statutory trigger is proved. Defendants in those cases face a higher classification, including for qualifying attempts. Whether that improves registration compliance or public safety is not measured by the act or fiscal notes. This briefing does not assume both triggers automatically stack or predict an individual sentence. Final law.
The Legislative Budget Board’s May 25, 2025 engrossed fiscal note expects no significant state fiscal implication or significant local enforcement, prosecution, supervision or confinement cost. Its criminal-justice impact statement recognizes that increased penalties can increase incarceration or length of stay, but assumes no significant overall correctional-resource impact here. The April 14 introduced note and impact statement reach the same conclusions. “No significant” projected budget effect does not mean no consequence for an affected defendant or no cost in an individual case. Engrossed fiscal note; engrossed impact statement; introduced fiscal note; introduced impact statement.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.