← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2421
HB2421 replaces May 31, 2025 with May 31, 2027 in two provisions governing the Save Historic Muny District in Austin.
Official caption: Relating to the date of dissolution of the Save Historic Muny District.
Official report lists House author(s): Howard, Bucy. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2421 replaces May 31, 2025 with May 31, 2027 in two provisions governing the Save Historic Muny District in Austin.
- First, the district’s authority to make a particular contract with Austin—receiving revenue from fees collected from municipally owned utility customers in the district in exchange for a public-benefit project or service—now requires a qualifying land agreement before May 31, 2027.
- Second, the district board must dissolve the district not later than May 31, 2027, unless a qualifying agreement exists as of that date, subject to the retained limits on dissolution of districts with outstanding bonded debt.
- Timing matters: the act became effective September 1, 2025, not immediately and not on May 31.
What does it do?
HB2421 replaces May 31, 2025 with May 31, 2027 in two provisions governing the Save Historic Muny District in Austin. Both concern an agreement with the owner of the historic Lions Municipal Golf Course land to purchase it or preserve it as a public golf course, publicly available parkland, or both. The act does not itself buy the property or prove that a preservation agreement has been reached. Final law, Sections 1–2; district definitions.
First, the district’s authority to make a particular contract with Austin—receiving revenue from fees collected from municipally owned utility customers in the district in exchange for a public-benefit project or service—now requires a qualifying land agreement before May 31, 2027. This is a condition on that contract authority, not a new automatic utility charge or an order that Austin transfer money. Final law, Section 1; project and service authority.
Second, the district board must dissolve the district not later than May 31, 2027, unless a qualifying agreement exists as of that date, subject to the retained limits on dissolution of districts with outstanding bonded debt. The contract provision’s “before” wording and dissolution provision’s “as of” wording are not identical. The law does not erase debt or promise that the district will exist forever. Final law, Section 2; dissolution rule; bonded-debt limits.
Timing matters: the act became effective September 1, 2025, not immediately and not on May 31. Its House vote was 99–43 with one present not voting, below the two-thirds-of-all-members threshold required by its immediate-effect clause. It became law without the governor’s signature. The text contains no express retroactive validation or revival clause; this explanation does not resolve the district’s legal or factual status during the interval after the former deadline and before the new law took effect. Final law, Section 3 and passage certifications; official history.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee and engrossed versions contain the same two deadline changes and conditional effective-date clause. The Senate committee and final texts make no substantive changes; their differences are printing and certification material. Both committees reported the bill without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. The final September 1 effective date resulted from the vote threshold, not a later amendment deleting an immediate-effect provision. Introduced text; House committee text; text versions; amendment index.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
The statutory changes give the preservation effort later agreement deadlines. Golf-course users, park users and supporters of preserving the land could benefit if negotiations succeed. The landowner is not compelled by this act to sell, and any purchase price, city contract or project costs still depend on separate arrangements. No new tax, appropriation or guaranteed acquisition funding is enacted here. Final law.
The Legislative Budget Board’s May 17, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. The March 21 introduced note agrees. Neither estimates a land purchase price, promises free preservation or establishes that a particular financing agreement exists. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.