2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2464
HB2464 limits how a municipality may regulate a business run from residential property by its owner or tenant to manufacture, provide or sell lawful goods or provide lawful services. “Business” includes a trade, occupation, profe…
Official caption: Relating to the authority of a municipality to regulate a home-based business.
Official report lists House author(s): Hefner. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2464 limits how a municipality may regulate a business run from residential property by its owner or tenant to manufacture, provide or sell lawful goods or provide lawful services. “Business” includes a trade, occupation, profession or other commercial activity.
- The strongest protection applies to a “no-impact home-based business.” It must meet all four conditions: employees plus clients or patrons on the property never exceed the municipal occupancy limit; it generates no on-street parking or substantial traffic increase; none of its activities are visible from a street; and it neither substantially increases neighborhood noise nor violates a municipal noise rule.
- Two other protections apply to home-based businesses generally, not only the no-impact category.
- Other safeguards remain: Subject to those prohibitions, a city may require compliance with federal, state and local law, including fire/building codes and health, sanitation, traffic, waste, pollution and noise rules.
- The law does not prevent enforcement of homeowners’ association rules, deed restrictions or other private agreements.
What does it do?
HB2464 limits how a municipality may regulate a business run from residential property by its owner or tenant to manufacture, provide or sell lawful goods or provide lawful services. “Business” includes a trade, occupation, profession or other commercial activity. The act became effective June 12, 2025 after meeting the immediate-effect vote threshold. Final law, Sections 1–2; business definition; official history.
The strongest protection applies to a “no-impact home-based business.” It must meet all four conditions: employees plus clients or patrons on the property never exceed the municipal occupancy limit; it generates no on-street parking or substantial traffic increase; none of its activities are visible from a street; and it neither substantially increases neighborhood noise nor violates a municipal noise rule. A city may not prohibit such a business or require its operator or property owner to obtain a license, permit or other approval to operate it. This is not an exemption for every business merely because its address is a home. Final law, new Section 229.902(a)–(b).
Two other protections apply to home-based businesses generally, not only the no-impact category. A city may not require nonresidential rezoning, or require a fire-sprinkler protection system where the residence consists only of a detached single-family structure or a multifamily structure with no more than two residential units. The sprinkler provision is not a blanket exemption for all apartment buildings or all fire-safety requirements. Final law, Section 229.902(b)(3).
Other safeguards remain. Subject to those prohibitions, a city may require compliance with federal, state and local law, including fire/building codes and health, sanitation, traffic, waste, pollution and noise rules. It may require the business to be compatible with residential use and secondary to the property’s use as a home. The act expressly permits limits or prohibitions on a home business that sells alcohol or illegal drugs, is a structured sober living home, or is a sexually oriented business under the referenced definition. This permission does not itself order every city to ban those uses or override other applicable law. Final law, Section 229.902(c); referenced business category.
The law does not prevent enforcement of homeowners’ association rules, deed restrictions or other private agreements. It also preserves municipal ordinances regulating short-term rental units. Nor does its municipal operating-approval limit itself waive a state occupational license or other applicable state or federal requirement. Final law, Section 229.902(c)–(d).
What changed along the way?
The House committee substitute added the express protection for municipal short-term-rental regulation to the introduced bill’s existing protection for private restrictions. The core no-impact-business protection and rezoning/sprinkler limits were already in the introduced text. Introduced text; House substitute.
All three indexed floor amendments were read and traced. On May 13, Bernal’s second-reading amendment added a broader permit-processing scheme: public application requirements, a 15-business-day decision deadline, concurrent applications and refunds for missed deadlines, with exceptions for new-building construction, zoning and plats. On May 14, Bernal’s third-reading amendment removed both that provision and its transition clause. The permit deadline and refund scheme therefore did not become law through HB2464. Adopted second-reading amendment; adopted deletion amendment.
Zwiener’s adopted third-reading amendment added the noise condition to the no-impact definition. It survived in the engrossed, Senate committee and final texts. The Senate made no further substantive change. Noise amendment; amendment index and adoption dates; text versions; final law.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Qualifying home-business operators and property owners gain relief from specified city operating approvals and restrictions. Cities lose some regulatory choices, while neighbors retain the protections built into the no-impact test and the surviving health, safety and residential-use rules. Private restrictions may still prevent an otherwise city-protected business. The act does not guarantee that a particular business qualifies or quantify savings for operators. Final law.
The Legislative Budget Board’s May 18, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. The March 31 introduced and May 5 substitute notes agree. They do not estimate private compliance savings, neighborhood effects or the number of newly opened businesses. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note; substitute fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.