2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2467

HB2467 requires peace officers commissioned by the state fire marshal to be paid under Schedule C, the salary schedule specified in the General Appropriations Act.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the compensation and benefits for certain peace officers commissioned by the state fire marshal.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): VanDeaver. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2467 requires peace officers commissioned by the state fire marshal to be paid under Schedule C, the salary schedule specified in the General Appropriations Act. It directs the State Auditor’s classification officer to classify commissioned investigators in the Texas Department of Insurance State Fire Marshal’s Office accordingly beginning with the 2026–27 budget period. It does not set one salary for every officer or cover every municipal firefighter. Final law, Sections 1 and 4.

The act expressly adds state fire marshal officers to the statutory definition used for hazardous-duty pay. The existing eligibility rules still matter, including the first-workday employment condition and at least 12 months of qualifying lifetime service credit by the end of the preceding month. The new listing is not a promise that every newly commissioned officer immediately receives every supplement. Final law, Section 2; hazardous-duty entitlement rule.

It also adds these officers to the special injury-leave law. That law allows leave without a salary deduction or use of other accrued leave for qualifying duty-related injuries, but excludes injuries to which the officer’s own gross negligence contributed and injuries related to routine office duties. Medical examination evidence and a Texas physician’s recommendation are required; the maximum for injuries occurring at one time is one year. Its rules also govern interaction with workers’ compensation and disability retirement. HB2467’s extension applies only to injuries on or after September 1, 2025. Final law, Sections 3 and 5; full injury-leave conditions.

The act took effect September 1, 2025. The temporary instruction to make the classification change expires September 1, 2027; that expiration does not sunset the permanent Schedule C pay requirement added to Section 417.006. The existing authority to commission fire/arson investigators and revoke a commission for just cause is retained and reorganized. Final law, Sections 1, 4 and 6; official history.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee and engrossed versions are substantively identical. The Senate committee and final versions differ only in printing/certification material. Both committees reported the bill without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. The pay classification, hazardous-duty listing, injury-leave extension and prospective injury rule were present from introduction. Introduced text; House committee text; text versions; amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Covered officers gain the specified pay treatment and benefits. The Department of Insurance bears additional payroll-related expenses. This could support retention or recruitment, but the fiscal notes do not measure either outcome or identify a uniform raise per officer. Final law; engrossed fiscal note.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 12, 2025 engrossed fiscal note projects $1,034,281 in additional spending in each of fiscal 2026 and 2027, about $2.07 million over those two years, from the Department of Insurance operating account. Each year’s estimate consists of $887,446 in salary increases plus $146,835 in retirement/Social Security costs. Annual costs rise to about $1.20 million by fiscal 2030. The April 8 introduced note gives the same estimates. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.

The note’s $0 net impact on general-revenue-related funds is not “no cost.” It assumes the insurance operating account’s maintenance-tax adjustments produce matching additional revenue to cover the expense. It anticipates no local-government fiscal impact. HB2467 itself makes no appropriation; the note says it could provide a legal basis for one. These are legislative estimates, not verified actual expenditures or a prediction of individual insurance premiums. Engrossed fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.