2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2468

HB2468 changes a buyer’s statutory right to cancel a real-estate contract when the seller did not provide the required public improvement district notice before signing.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the right of a purchaser to terminate a contract of purchase and sale of real property for failure to provide notice that the property is located in a public improvement district.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Harris. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2468 changes a buyer’s statutory right to cancel a real-estate contract when the seller did not provide the required public improvement district notice before signing. These notices explain obligations to pay district assessments for public improvements or services. Under the amended rule, the buyer may cancel for any reason, no later than the seventh day after receiving the notice, but may use this particular cancellation right only if the municipality or county filed the district service plan with the county clerk before the contract date as required by the referenced law. Final law, Section 1; notice contents and scope.

The previous version simply said the purchaser was entitled to terminate when the contract was signed without the notice. HB2468 adds the express seven-day limit measured from receipt of the notice, not from signing, and the pre-contract service-plan filing condition. It does not remove the seller’s underlying pre-contract notice duty or cancel the district assessment itself. Nor does this subsection replace other rights that may arise from a contract or other applicable law. Final law; full pre-contract notice provision.

Closing still matters. The unchanged surrounding law says that if the seller supplies the notice at or before closing and the buyer elects to close, the buyer is conclusively treated as waiving this termination right and the specified statutory damages remedies, despite the earlier late notice. Separate provisions govern damages and liability protections; HB2468 does not create a fresh seven-day right to undo a completed closing regardless of those rules. Full notice and waiver provision; statutory damages provisions.

The service plan describes projected improvement costs and annual debt and includes the notice form. The incorporated law requires filing within seven days after plan approval and after amendments or updates. That governmental filing deadline is distinct from the buyer’s new seven-day period after receiving notice. Service-plan filing rule.

The act applies only when a binding contract is executed on or after June 20, 2025, its immediate effective date. Earlier contracts remain governed by the law in effect when executed; a later closing date alone does not put an older contract under the new rule. Final law, Sections 2–3; official history.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee and engrossed texts are substantively identical. The Senate committee and enrolled versions differ only in printing/certification material. Both committees reported the bill without amendments, and the amendment index lists none. The seven-day receipt-based limit, service-plan filing condition and prospective contract rule all appeared in the introduced bill and survived into law. Introduced text; House committee text; text versions; amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Sellers gain limits on this cancellation route, particularly when the local government had not filed the service plan before signing. Buyers receiving late notice must track the receipt date, filing history and closing decision carefully; some buyers lose a statutory exit they previously had. The law does not reimburse assessments, guarantee disclosure compliance or establish that a particular failed transaction caused no harm. Final law.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 9, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal implication and assumes state costs can be absorbed using existing resources. The March 24 introduced note agrees. Neither estimates private transaction losses, litigation expenses or changes in cancellation frequency. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.