2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2488

HB2488 authorizes the Division of Workers’ Compensation to conduct a contested case hearing by videoconference when either the division finds good cause or the parties mutually agree.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to conducting certain contested case hearings under the Texas workers' compensation system by remote communication.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Bell, Keith, Harris Davila, Hefner, Lujan, Barry. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2488 authorizes the Division of Workers’ Compensation to conduct a contested case hearing by videoconference when either the division finds good cause or the parties mutually agree. These are alternative grounds: agreement by every party is not required when the division makes the good-cause determination. The statute says the division “may” use video; it does not let one party automatically demand it or make every hearing remote. Final law, Section 1.

The new authority applies notwithstanding the existing location rule, which generally places a contested case hearing within 75 miles of the claimant’s residence at the time of injury unless the division finds good cause for another location. It is specific to contested case hearings. The separate law already allowed telephone or video benefit review conferences, which are a different stage of the dispute process. HB2488 does not itself authorize telephone-only contested case hearings or change what issues may be decided. Existing proceedings rule; contested-hearing scope; final law.

The workers’ compensation commissioner must adopt implementation rules as soon as practicable. The act took effect June 20, 2025 and applies to hearings requested on or after that date. Earlier hearing requests remain governed by the prior law, even if the hearing occurs later. The trigger is the request date, not the date of the worker’s injury. Final law, Sections 2–4; official history.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee and engrossed texts are substantively identical. Senate committee and final text differences are printing/certification material only. Both committees reported the bill without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. The alternative good-cause/agreement grounds, rulemaking instruction and hearing-request transition were present from the start. Introduced text; House committee text; text versions; amendment index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Injured workers and other hearing participants may avoid travel and scheduling burdens when video is appropriate. They also need usable technology and a setting in which they can participate effectively. The division gains flexibility but must apply the statutory grounds and implementation rules. The law does not increase compensation benefits or establish that remote hearings are always faster or fairer. Final law.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 22, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal implication, assuming costs can be absorbed using existing resources. The March 22 introduced note agrees. Neither estimates participants’ travel savings, technology costs or changes in case outcomes. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.