2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2495

HB2495 expressly adds the right to designate a child’s school and enroll the child there, subject to the school’s eligibility and admissions requirements, to the Family Code’s list of parental rights.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to certain rights of a child or a parent or the sole managing conservator of a child in relation to the child's enrollment in school.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Dutton, Rodríguez Ramos. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2495 expressly adds the right to designate a child’s school and enroll the child there, subject to the school’s eligibility and admissions requirements, to the Family Code’s list of parental rights. The existing general right to make education decisions remains. This does not guarantee admission to any chosen school, waive residency or other eligibility rules, or create tuition funding. Parental rights remain subject to applicable court orders and the other limits in the surrounding statute. Final law, Section 3; full parental-rights statute.

The act separately adds that explicit right to the powers of a parent appointed sole managing conservator—the person assigned the specified primary legal responsibilities by a court. For that parent, the statute lists it as an exclusive right unless limited by court order. It also adds the right to the provision governing a nonparent, licensed child-placing agency or the Department of Family and Protective Services appointed as managing conservator, subject to court orders and other provisions of the chapter. It does not appoint anyone as conservator or resolve a particular dispute between joint conservators. Final law, Sections 4–5.

Older students’ rights are preserved. The act updates Education Code 26.002 so the new school-selection/enrollment right is included among educational rights exercised by a student age 18 or older or a student legally emancipated for general purposes, subject to the stated federal-law and court-order/incapacity exceptions. It similarly updates the Family Code’s transfer of educational rights to a generally emancipated minor. It does not newly give parents unrestricted control over an adult student’s school choice. Final law, Sections 1–2; student-rights provision; effect of general emancipation.

The act took effect September 1, 2025. Its changes to the two conservatorship provisions apply to parent-child cases pending in a trial court on that date or filed on or after it. That is not a direction to rewrite every previously final custody order automatically. The transition clause specifically addresses those two provisions, not a blanket delay of every change in the act. Final law, Sections 6–7; official history.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee and engrossed bills focused on the two conservatorship provisions, with the pending/new-case transition and September 1 effective date. The Senate committee substitute broadened the bill by adding the general parental school-selection/enrollment right and the two corresponding provisions protecting adult and emancipated students’ exercise of educational rights. Those additions remained in the final law. Introduced text; engrossed text; Senate substitute; final law.

The official amendment index lists no individual amendments, but the bill did change in the Senate through that substitute. Official history records Senate passage with amendments and House concurrence on May 28. The Senate substitute and enrolled text match substantively. An empty floor-amendment index is therefore not evidence that this bill passed unchanged. Amendment index; text versions; history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Parents, authorized caregivers, students and schools gain clearer statutory language about who can select a school and complete enrollment. Schools retain eligibility and admissions requirements, and courts retain the stated power to limit rights. The act does not establish that every enrollment disagreement disappears or that any particular student gains a new seat. Final law.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 22, 2025 second-house fiscal note, also posted with the final version, anticipates no significant state fiscal implication and no local-government fiscal implication. It assumes the affected family-services, court-administration and education agencies can absorb costs with existing resources. The introduced, engrossed and Senate-substitute notes reach the same budget conclusion. None estimates private legal costs or the number of enrollment disputes avoided. Final-posted fiscal note; second-house note; introduced note; engrossed note; Senate-substitute note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.