2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2510

HB2510 creates two specific licensing offenses: operating an assisted living facility without its required Chapter 247 license, and providing personal assistance services to an assisted-living resident without a Chapter 142 licen…

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to assisted living facility operations and provision of certain services to assisted living facility residents without a license; creating a criminal offense.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Turner, Rose, Hull, Tinderholt, Collier. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2510 creates two specific licensing offenses: operating an assisted living facility without its required Chapter 247 license, and providing personal assistance services to an assisted-living resident without a Chapter 142 license when the provider is required to hold one. These are separate offenses for facility operation and service provision, not a declaration that every resident’s helper needs an individual license. Final law, Sections 1–2.

Each offense is normally a Class A misdemeanor. It becomes a third-degree felony if the person has a previous conviction under that same new section. The act does not say any unrelated conviction triggers this enhancement, or that a prior conviction under one of the two sections automatically enhances the other. For an individual, the ordinary Class A range is up to one year in jail, a fine up to $4,000, or both; the ordinary third-degree range is two to ten years’ imprisonment and a possible fine up to $10,000. Those are statutory ranges, not a prediction of a particular sentence. Final law; Class A punishment; third-degree punishment.

Existing licensing definitions and exemptions still matter. Chapter 142’s exemptions include, under their stated conditions, an individual hired and paid directly by the client or family and an employee acting only for a licensed agency. Personal assistance services include routine help with daily living, not just medical treatment. Chapter 247 separately defines assisted living and contains exemptions; not every shared home or boarding arrangement is an assisted living facility. HB2510 does not repeal these boundaries or create a new license for everyone providing informal help. Service definitions; service licensing exemptions; facility definition; facility exemptions.

The act took effect September 1, 2025. It adds the two criminal sections to an existing licensing system; it does not establish assisted-living licensing for the first time or repeal existing injunction authority. It does not make injury or abuse of a resident an express element of these licensing offenses. The act does not specify a mental state, so this explanation does not label the offenses automatic, no-fault liability; general criminal-law rules remain relevant. Final law; existing facility license rule; injunction authority; general culpability rule.

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee, engrossed, Senate committee and enrolled texts match substantively. Both offenses, the same-section prior-conviction enhancement and the September 1 effective date were present from introduction. The official amendment index lists no amendments; history records favorable committee reports without amendments and passage without a substantive revision. Printing marks and certification text are not policy changes. Introduced text; final law; all text versions; amendment index; history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Residents and families could benefit from stronger deterrence of unlicensed operations, while compliant providers gain an additional enforcement tool against unlawful competitors. Those are potential effects, not proof that the law has reduced harm. People covered by the new offenses face criminal prosecution, and local police, prosecutors, courts and correctional systems may take on additional work. The act does not appropriate new inspection or enforcement funding. Final law.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 12, 2025 fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal implication and assumes local enforcement, prosecution, supervision and confinement costs would not be significant. Revenue effects depend on the number of offenses and court costs. The April 14 introduced note reaches the same conclusion. These are estimates, not guarantees of zero spending. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.

The April 14 criminal-justice impact statement notes that new offenses can increase correctional demands but expects no significant effect on state correctional populations or resources. Its comparison data—one fiscal-year-2024 arrest for offenses relating to home and community support services licenses—are background data, not a count of prosecutions under these new 2025 offenses or a measurement of all unlicensed care. Criminal-justice impact statement.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.