← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2559
HB2559 makes it harder for a city to impose a covered development moratorium—a temporary halt on residential or commercial development.
Official caption: Relating to the imposition by a municipality of a moratorium on property development in certain circumstances.
Official report lists House author(s): Patterson, Ward Johnson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2559 makes it harder for a city to impose a covered development moratorium—a temporary halt on residential or commercial development.
- For adopting a moratorium, a city must publish newspaper notice at least 30 days before a hearing and send certified-mail notice to people who properly requested it by certified or registered mail to the municipal secretary within the specified preceding two-year period.
- By the 12th day after the second hearing, the governing body must begin its final determination through at least two ordinance readings, which must be at least 28 days apart.
- The law applies the 90-day expiration rule to moratoriums throughout this subchapter.
- Existing requirements for substantive justification and written findings remain, as do waiver procedures and protections for qualifying projects already in progress and previously filed zoning applications.
What does it do?
HB2559 makes it harder for a city to impose a covered development moratorium—a temporary halt on residential or commercial development. It changes the procedures in Local Government Code Chapter 212, Subchapter E, not every land-use rule or every type of industrial activity. The subchapter’s commercial-property definition excludes heavy industrial uses and quarries. Final law; definitions and scope.
For adopting a moratorium, a city must publish newspaper notice at least 30 days before a hearing and send certified-mail notice to people who properly requested it by certified or registered mail to the municipal secretary within the specified preceding two-year period. The city’s governing body must hold two public hearings at least 30 days apart. The act removes the former provision that automatically started a temporary moratorium after notice publication. Final law, Section 1.
By the 12th day after the second hearing, the governing body must begin its final determination through at least two ordinance readings, which must be at least 28 days apart. Final adoption requires three-fourths of all governing-body members, not merely three-fourths of those present. The statute also bars adoption if the prescribed process is missed. The 12-day language is a deadline to begin the determination, not a claim that two readings separated by 28 days must both finish within 12 days. Final law, amended Section 212.134(f).
The law applies the 90-day expiration rule to moratoriums throughout this subchapter. An extension requires a public hearing and written findings identifying the problem, progress toward fixing it, a definite extension period and evidence that the problem will be resolved within that period. The aggregate duration cannot exceed 180 days. A new moratorium cannot be adopted before the second anniversary of the previous one’s expiration if it addresses the same harm, affects the same property type or covers the same area; meeting any one of those comparisons triggers the restriction. Final law, Section 2.
Existing requirements for substantive justification and written findings remain, as do waiver procedures and protections for qualifying projects already in progress and previously filed zoning applications. The separate newspaper-notice rule for an extension hearing—at least 15 days—was not amended by this act. The act took effect September 1, 2025; it does not include a separate transition clause resolving every previously adopted moratorium. Final law, Sections 3–4; justification; extension notice; waivers; existing-project protection.
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee and engrossed versions have identical operative text; Senate and enrolled printings retain it. The amendment index lists no amendments, and both committees reported the bill without amendments. Introduced; House committee; engrossed; Senate printing; history; text index; amendment index.
Compared with prior law, newspaper notice moves from four days to at least 30 days before the adoption hearing, ordinance readings move from at least four days apart to at least 28, and the two hearings are placed before the governing body rather than the old governing-body/zoning-commission arrangement. The act repeals the separate 120-day expiration-and-extension provision and broadens rules that previously applied only to certain commercial moratoriums to the whole covered subchapter. Final law, marked changes and repeals.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Landowners, builders and residents gain earlier notice and more opportunities to participate before a halt is imposed. Developers may face fewer or shorter interruptions. Cities lose the former automatic temporary-stop mechanism and face a longer process, a higher voting threshold and tighter renewal limits while responding to infrastructure or other qualifying public-facility problems. The law does not guarantee approval of a project, new water or road capacity, lower home prices or a particular local outcome. Final law.
The Legislative Budget Board’s May 2, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal implication and no significant local-government fiscal implication. The March 26 introduced note says the same. Neither quantifies private development savings, city infrastructure needs or costs of a particular dispute. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced fiscal note.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.