2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2596

HB2596 lets victims of burglary punishable under Penal Code Section 30.02(c)(2) or (d) seek a Chapter 7B protective order, regardless of their relationship to the alleged offender.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the issuance of certain protective orders for certain burglary offenses.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Metcalf. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2596 lets victims of burglary punishable under Penal Code Section 30.02(c)(2) or (d) seek a Chapter 7B protective order, regardless of their relationship to the alleged offender. Those provisions cover qualifying second- and first-degree burglaries of a habitation, meaning a structure or vehicle adapted for overnight accommodation and specified connected or associated structures. This is not a blanket extension to every shop burglary or vehicle break-in. An adult may apply for a victim who is under 18 or an adult ward, and a prosecutor may apply on a victim’s behalf. Final law, Sections 1–2; burglary categories; habitation definition.

A court may issue a temporary order without prior notice or a hearing if the application shows a clear and present danger of the listed conduct or other harm. After a hearing, the court must issue an order if there are reasonable grounds to believe the applicant is a victim of a listed offense; conviction or deferred-adjudication community supervision supplies those grounds. Replacing the old wording with the full offense-list reference also expressly includes indecent assault in the mandatory-issuance provision, where the previous wording omitted it. Existing order conditions can restrict threatening contact, approaching specified places and other conduct to prevent future harm. Final law, Sections 3–4; available conditions.

If no application is already filed, the prosecutor generally must promptly apply after conviction or deferred adjudication. The existing exception remains: a victim may ask the prosecutor not to file, but that exception does not apply to a minor or adult ward. The act extends the relevant information and notification rights to the newly covered burglary victims, including information about how and where to apply, requesting prosecutor assistance, and notice when an application is filed. It does not extend every unrelated sexual-assault victim service merely by changing the article’s heading. Final law, Sections 2 and 6–7; application exception.

An order is not automatically lifelong for every burglary case. Mandatory lifetime duration requires both a qualifying conviction or deferred adjudication and an independent requirement to register for life as a sex offender. Otherwise the existing duration rule allows a lifetime or shorter stated term and defaults to two years if no term is stated. The act extends the right to ask the court to rescind an order to the added victims and their eligible representatives; an alleged-offender parent or guardian cannot use that representative route. The law took effect September 1, 2025 and prevails over conflicting nonsubstantive code-correction legislation from the same session. Final law, Sections 5 and 8–9; duration and rescission.

What changed along the way?

The introduced proposal was narrower: it covered first-degree habitation burglary only when committed with intent to commit one of the already listed sexual, stalking or trafficking offenses. The House substitute removed that additional intent limitation and included second-degree habitation burglary under Section 30.02(c)(2) as well as subsection (d). It also conformed the headings. That broader substitute became law. Introduced; House substitute.

There are no separately indexed amendments. The substitute and engrossed text match substantively, and Senate and enrolled printings retain that policy. Certified votes were 147–0 in the House, with two present and not voting, and 31–0 in the Senate. Amendment index; history; engrossed; Senate text; enrolled; text index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Qualifying burglary victims gain access to protective-order safeguards without needing a family or dating relationship with the alleged offender. Courts and prosecutors may receive additional applications, while people subject to orders can face restrictions on contact and movement. An application alone does not guarantee an order, and an order does not guarantee physical safety. Final law.

The Legislative Budget Board’s May 9, 2025 engrossed fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal effect; the Office of Court Administration acknowledged possible new protective-order filings. The March 24 and April 2 notes reach the same budget conclusion. Their descriptions still refer to burglary with intent to commit certain other offenses, so they should not be used to narrow the broader enacted eligibility. None quantifies the number of additional applications or an individual’s legal costs. Engrossed fiscal note; introduced note; substitute note.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.