← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2688
HB2688 changes Houston's firefighter and police pensions beginning September 1, 2025.
Official caption: Relating to the public retirement systems of certain municipalities.
Official report lists House author(s): Harless, Oliverson, Perez, Mary Ann, Metcalf, Thompson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2688 changes Houston's firefighter and police pensions beginning September 1, 2025.
- Firefighters: Members hired or rehired under the post-2017 tier can qualify for a service pension after 20 years of service, replacing their rule that age plus service must total 70.
- The firefighter Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) now admits otherwise-eligible members of the newer tier after 20 years of participation.
- Police officers: Normal retirement becomes available after 20 years of service, or at age 60 with at least 10 years, without the former hire-date distinction and post-October 9, 2004 rule of 70.
- For both funds, the law replaces an actuarial costing method based on newly hired employees' benefits with one reflecting each individual employee's benefit tier.
- The firefighter fund's population threshold increases from 1.6 million to 2 million.
What does it do?
HB2688 changes Houston’s firefighter and police pensions beginning September 1, 2025. It broadens retirement and deferred-retirement options, changes how pension costs are allocated, and removes a specific firefighter-benefit court-appeal procedure. It does not give every member the same benefit amount. Final law
Firefighters: Members hired or rehired under the post-2017 tier can qualify for a service pension after 20 years of service, replacing their rule that age plus service must total 70. Their existing benefit formula and 80%-of-average-salary ceiling remain. The normal-retirement definition also recognizes age 50 with at least 10 years of service. Members leaving for reasons other than death with 10 to fewer than 20 years can receive a deferred pension starting at age 50, regardless of hire tier: 1.7% of average monthly salary for each year of participation. The existing option to choose a contribution refund instead remains; those leaving with fewer than 10 years receive a refund without interest under Section 8(c). The retirement changes apply to retirements on or after September 1; the deferred-pension changes apply to departures on or after that date. Prior firefighter statute, Sections 4 and 8
The firefighter Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) now admits otherwise-eligible members of the newer tier after 20 years of participation. DROP lets an employee keep working while pension amounts accumulate in an account; the election fixes the retirement date used to calculate the pension and, once approved, is irrevocable. The maximum participation period and monthly pension-credit period increase from 13 to 15 years. Existing participants are included. Earnings can continue after that limit, but this is not permission to earn unlimited monthly pension credits. Existing plan rules, including board procedures, remain.
Police officers: Normal retirement becomes available after 20 years of service, or at age 60 with at least 10 years, without the former hire-date distinction and post-October 9, 2004 rule of 70. Active members who reach normal retirement age can elect DROP, instead of limiting it to the older hiring group with 20 years. Accepted elections remain irrevocable; existing benefit calculations and DROP limits on additional service/pay credit remain. The firefighter 15-year provision is not a new 15-year rule for the police plan. Prior police statute, Sections 2 and 14
For both funds, the law replaces an actuarial costing method based on newly hired employees’ benefits with one reflecting each individual employee’s benefit tier. This changes the allocation between future normal costs and accrued liabilities, not the amount of money already held by the funds. The reproduced valuation rules retain the 7% assumed-return ceiling and existing 30-year liability-layer framework.
The firefighter fund’s population threshold increases from 1.6 million to 2 million. The law also repeals Section 12’s specific district-court appeal process for firefighter benefit decisions, which had covered rejection or amount of benefits and required notice within 20 days. It removes the corresponding court-appeal reference from pension-benefit committee decisions while retaining available internal appeals to the board. That is a loss of a particular statutory appeal route—not a finding that every possible court remedy is unavailable.
What changed along the way?
The official history, version list, and amendment index show substantial revisions, not simply a renamed bill.
The filed bill and House committee substitute proposed additional firefighter changes. Among them were increased DROP earnings credits, a new annual pension increase for some DROP participants, expanded post-retirement options and return-to-service provisions, and changes to contribution/debt-payment rules. The filed proposal’s 7.5% assumed-return ceiling did not survive the House substitute.
The adopted Harless House amendment preserved the word “compounded” in a proposed DROP-earnings calculation; that amendment appears in the House-engrossed text. It did not make the proposed increase from 65% to 75% of the five-year investment-return measure final law.
The adopted Huffman Senate substitute, reproduced in the Senate amendment packet, removed those proposed DROP earnings and extra pension increases, the proposed 15-year debt reset, and other expansion/contribution provisions. It instead added the police changes and the firefighter 15-year DROP period described above. The Senate version and final law contain the same substantive provisions. The existing firefighter DROP earnings formula—65% of the compounded five-year average return, with a 2.5% floor—was not increased by this bill.
The House passed the bill 146–0, the Senate passed its version 31–0, and the House concurred 132–1. The governor signed it June 20. Its conflict clause gives it priority over another 2025 regular-session act unless the legislature expressly resolves the conflict by reference to HB2688.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Newer-tier firefighters and police officers can gain earlier retirement or DROP access. Firefighters who leave after 10–19 years gain access to the age-50 deferred pension, and DROP participants can receive two more years of monthly credits. Choosing DROP or a refund involves tradeoffs; eligibility changes do not guarantee that either choice is best for a particular member. Firefighters challenging benefit decisions lose the repealed statutory court-appeal procedure.
The final fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact, but the May 21 actuarial impact statement for the Senate version supplies more detail. Based on July 1, 2024 valuations, it estimates the firefighter required contribution rate would rise from 26.48% to 26.66% of payroll in 2026, and from 13% to 13.22% in 2027. The police rate would rise from 22.58% to 22.60%. These are increases of 0.18, 0.22 and 0.02 percentage points—not dollar amounts.
The same analysis projects calculated unfunded liabilities falling from about $380 million to $362.4 million for firefighters and $636 million to $599 million for police, alongside higher normal-cost rates. Much of this reflects the changed actuarial method. It is not an immediate cash windfall or a guarantee of future savings. Both systems remain within the Pension Review Board’s funding guidelines in that analysis; actual results depend on assumptions, experience and future valuations. Larger cost estimates in earlier actuarial statements describe earlier proposals, not the final law.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.