2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB2712
HB2712 lets covered water and sewer utilities choose a historical, forecast, or mixed 12-month “test year” for a rate case.
Official caption: Relating to test years used for ratemaking purposes by certain water and sewer utilities.
Official report lists House author(s): Darby. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB2712 lets covered water and sewer utilities choose a historical, forecast, or mixed 12-month “test year” for a rate case.
- The rule covers Class A, B, C and D utilities, the statutory size categories from the smallest to largest covered public utilities.
- The chosen period must start on the first day of a calendar or fiscal quarter and last 12 consecutive months.
- The law directs regulators to use test-year information in assessing reasonable/fair returns and operating expenses.
- Two safeguards matter: A utility using a fully forecast test year must file actual results and supporting data no later than 30 days after the last day of the test year's last quarter, and give the filing to the parties in the rate case.
- For a future or mixed test year, if the regulator determines in the next rate proceeding that the information produced rates yielding more than a fair return, it must order refunds of collections above the fair-return rate for the period of overcollection.
What does it do?
HB2712 lets covered water and sewer utilities choose a historical, forecast, or mixed 12-month “test year” for a rate case. A test year is the period whose financial information regulators use to work out rates. The law replaces the former definition based on the most recent 12 months of available operating data. It does not itself approve a rate increase. Final law
The rule covers Class A, B, C and D utilities, the statutory size categories from the smallest to largest covered public utilities. That does not mean every city-owned system or water district: Chapter 13’s definition of “utility” excludes municipal corporations, most political subdivisions and member-owned water-supply corporations, among others. Municipal governments can nevertheless act as regulators of covered utilities.
The chosen period must start on the first day of a calendar or fiscal quarter and last 12 consecutive months. It may start no later than 18 months after the utility files its notice of intended rate change and must end no earlier than 18 months before that filing. These limits apply to the start and end separately; this is not a requirement that the entire year fall within 18 months of filing.
The law directs regulators to use test-year information in assessing reasonable/fair returns and operating expenses. It requires the rate base—the investment on which a return is calculated—to include facilities projected to be in service through the end of the test year. It also removes “currently used” and “currently used and useful” restrictions from specified depreciation provisions. It retains the exclusion for property funded through explicit customer agreements or customer construction contributions. The separately stated construction-work-in-progress provisions retain their exceptional-relief safeguards; the new projected-in-service provision applies notwithstanding Section 13.185(b).
Two safeguards matter: A utility using a fully forecast test year must file actual results and supporting data no later than 30 days after the last day of the test year’s last quarter, and give the filing to the parties in the rate case. If the information is not available by then, it must give written notice of when it will be available, serve the parties, and file as soon as possible once it is available.
For a future or mixed test year, if the regulator determines in the next rate proceeding that the information produced rates yielding more than a fair return, it must order refunds of collections above the fair-return rate for the period of overcollection. This is not an automatic annual refund or a promise that every forecasting error produces a refund immediately.
The act became effective September 1, 2025, but the changed ratemaking provisions apply only to proceedings beginning on or after the effective date of the implementing rules. The Public Utility Commission was directed to adopt those rules by September 1, 2026. Earlier proceedings remain under the prior law. This briefing verifies the statutory deadline and transition, not whether a particular proceeding has reached the rules’ applicability date.
What changed along the way?
The history, version index, and amendment index show two adopted amendments. Both survive in the final law.
The filed bill and House committee text already allowed future test years and projected facilities. Darby’s House amendment, adopted May 5, added actual-results reporting and the unavailable-data procedure, required rules by September 1, 2026, and delayed application to proceedings beginning after those rules take effect. It replaced the original transition tied directly to the act’s effective date. House amendment text
Kolkhorst’s Senate amendment, adopted May 23, added the next-rate-case refund requirement for excessive returns based on future or mixed test-year information. The Senate committee version did not yet contain that protection. Senate amendment text
The House initially passed the bill 135–13, with one present but not voting; the Senate passed it 26–5. The House concurred in the Senate amendment 101–38, with one present but not voting. The bill became law without the governor’s signature on June 20, 2025; it was not signed by the governor.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Covered utilities can seek rates reflecting anticipated expenses and facilities, potentially reducing the lag between investment and cost recovery. Customers could benefit from better-funded service, but could also pay rates based on forecasts that later prove too high. The reporting and refund provisions provide checks, with refunds dependent on the regulator’s finding in the next proceeding. Neither savings nor an increase of a particular size is guaranteed.
The final May 24 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local fiscal effect and assumes administrative costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It does not estimate a household’s water bill or say the customer effect is zero. Rate outcomes depend on the individual utility, evidence and regulatory decision.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.