2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2731

Beginning September 1, 2025, HB2731 changes the special roadside-regulation authority for counties bordering Mexico.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the regulation of roadside vendors and solicitors in certain counties.

Became law without signatureSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Muñoz. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

Beginning September 1, 2025, HB2731 changes the special roadside-regulation authority for counties bordering Mexico. It lowers the qualifying population from more than 870,000 to more than 200,000, while narrowing the activities covered by that particular authority. A qualifying county’s commissioners court may adopt an order; the bill itself does not impose a countywide ban. Final law

The authority applies in unincorporated areas, for activities in a parking lot or on or in a public highway or road’s right-of-way. The listed activities are sales and vendor structures by a vendor of live animals, and solicitation of money. The former cross-reference broadly covering food and merchandise vendors is removed from this border-county provision. So is the restriction limiting highway/right-of-way regulation to roads with speed limits of at least 40 mph.

A county may retain the specified setback: a vendor can be required to stay at least half the adjacent right-of-way’s width away from the road’s edge. But an order under this border-county authority may not prohibit the sale of livestock. That protects against a prohibition; it is not a blanket exemption from all regulation.

The existing chapter permits vendor/solicitor permits, reasonable fees and removal of structures violating regulations. Conflicting state statutes or agency rules prevail. Knowingly violating a chapter regulation, or knowingly obstructing or threatening to obstruct removal of a violating structure, remains a Class C misdemeanor, with each continuing day a separate offense. HB2731 changes the reach of the framework, not those existing penalty provisions.

The law does not give all Texas counties general power over every roadside business. Other authority can apply separately: the enacted version leaves subsection 285.001(a) to other law, and the official consolidated statute also reflects HB2012’s separate county-population expansion. Whether a particular county has adopted an order requires checking that county’s rules.

What changed along the way?

The filed bill, House committee text and House-passed version would also have lowered the general non-border population threshold from more than 1.3 million to more than 500,000. That broader proposal did not survive in HB2731.

The Senate committee substitute removed that change, narrowed the border provision to the live-animal-vendor and solicitation language, and moved the livestock-sale protection into subsection (c). The complete Senate amendment packet contains the adopted substitute; its operative text matches the final act. The floor-amendment index says no amendments, but that does not mean the Senate passed the unchanged House text. All versions

The House first passed it 82–38, with three present but not voting; the Senate passed its version 28–3; the House concurred 99–38, with one present but not voting. It became law without the governor’s signature June 20, 2025, with the September 1 effective date. Official history

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Newly eligible border counties gain a local tool for managing the covered roadside activities. Drivers, residents and animal buyers may benefit from chosen safety rules, while affected vendors and solicitors may face permit fees, placement limits or enforcement. The final narrowing also limits the types of vendors reachable through this particular border-county subsection. Those effects depend on adopted local orders, not just passage of the bill.

The final May 29 fiscal note anticipates no state fiscal effect and no significant local fiscal effect. It does not calculate private vendor compliance costs or set a permit fee.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.