2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2742

HB2742 preserves access to an adopted two-part property-tax payment option when tax bills are mailed after November 30.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the split-payment of ad valorem taxes.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Vasut. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2742 preserves access to an adopted two-part property-tax payment option when tax bills are mailed after November 30. It takes effect January 1, 2026, and applies only to taxes for tax years beginning on or after that date—not automatically to 2025 taxes paid during 2026. Final law

Where the split-payment option applies, the ordinary schedule remains half before December 1 and the other half before July 1 of the following year, without penalty or interest. For bills mailed after November 30, the new first-payment deadline is before the first day of the month after the first full calendar month following mailing. For example, a bill mailed December 15 has January as the first full following month, so the first half must be paid before February 1. The act does not similarly move the July deadline.

This is not a statewide right to split every tax bill. The existing local adoption and collection rules remain. A taxing unit collecting its own taxes may adopt the option; the existing law also addresses taxes collected for other units, appraisal-district collection and a geographically limited opt-out. Check with the collector whether the option applies to the particular taxes. Split-payment framework

The bill removes the rule that previously made split payments unavailable for taxes calculated too late for that option. It leaves the corresponding restriction on certain early-payment discounts in place. A split payment changes timing, not the amount of tax owed and not the separate eligibility rules for discounts.

For a property owner pursuing a court appeal, the bill also allows the new late-mailing deadline for the first half of the payment needed to preserve that appeal, when the taxes qualify for split payment. It does not waive payment altogether or change the existing rules that determine the required amount, the court’s inability-to-pay relief or the appeal deadline. Appeal-payment framework

What changed along the way?

The filed, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions have the same operative provisions; only printing material and enactment certifications differ. The amendment index lists no amendments, and history records committee passage without amendment. There is no adopted floor proposal to attribute. All text versions

The House passed HB2742 146–0, with one present but not voting, and the Senate passed it 31–0. The governor signed it May 29, 2025. Official history

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Owners receiving late-mailed bills may retain the ability to spread a payment over two installments rather than lose the option because the original first-payment date has passed. Owners appealing their property taxes gain the matching timing rule. Local collectors may need to adjust notices and payment processing; cash receipts can arrive later. No tax exemption or guaranteed dollar saving is created.

The May 10 fiscal note for the House-passed text—the latest fiscal note listed, with unchanged operative text afterward—anticipates no state fiscal effect and no significant local fiscal effect. The March 30 introduced note reaches the same conclusion. Neither supplies a quantified multiyear estimate or predicts an individual owner’s savings.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.