2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2760

HB2760 specifies that a party challenging a final Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) unemployment-compensation decision must bring the court-review action in a county court at law or district court.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to judicial review of a Texas Workforce Commission decision in an unemployment compensation proceeding.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Villalobos. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2760 specifies that a party challenging a final Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) unemployment-compensation decision must bring the court-review action in a county court at law or district court. It replaces the less specific phrase “court of competent jurisdiction.” It does not name justice courts or constitutional county courts as alternatives. Final law

The law took effect September 1, 2025, and applies only when the TWC decision becomes final on or after that date. Review of a decision that became final earlier remains governed by the former law—even if a later procedural step occurs after September 1.

The filing window is unchanged: the action must be filed on or after the decision becomes final and no later than the 14th day afterward. That is not simply 14 days after the decision is mailed. Existing law generally makes a commission decision final 14 days after mailing unless the commission reopens the appeal or a party timely requests rehearing. Finality rule

The bill does not rewrite the remaining review requirements: the action is against TWC, other parties to the commission proceeding must be defendants, administrative remedies must be exhausted (a rehearing motion is not required for exhaustion), and the existing county-of-filing rules still apply. Nor does it change the existing “trial de novo based on the substantial evidence rule” standard. In short, it identifies the court types; it does not create a new benefit or an unrestricted second chance to claim benefits. Judicial-review provisions

What changed along the way?

All five listed versions—filed, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled—have the same operative text. The amendment index lists none; both committees reported the bill without amendments. All versions

The House passed HB2760 147–0, with one present but not voting; the Senate passed it 31–0. The governor signed it June 20, 2025. Official history

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Claimants, employers, TWC and court staff receive a more explicit instruction about which court types handle judicial review. A party still bears the procedural burden of filing correctly and on time; the bill does not guarantee reversal, increase benefits or shift attorney fees.

The May 16 fiscal note, the latest listed for the unchanged House-passed text, anticipates no significant state or local fiscal effect and assumes associated costs can be absorbed with existing resources. The April 17 introduced note agrees. Neither quantifies a multiyear cost or individual litigant expenses.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.