2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2842

HB2842 creates an additional route for specified entities to seek a Texas Parks and Wildlife Department permit to control white-tailed deer by lethal means.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the control by lethal means of white-tailed deer in certain areas.

Became law without signatureSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Zwiener, Cole, Flores, Metcalf, Vasut. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2842 creates an additional route for specified entities to seek a Texas Parks and Wildlife Department permit to control white-tailed deer by lethal means. It took effect September 1, 2025. Eligible entities are political subdivisions, state or federal agencies, higher-education institutions and qualifying property owners’ associations. It is not a general permission for any individual to kill deer. Final law

An entity must give the department written evidence showing either:

  • Lethal control is necessary to prevent deer from damaging habitat of a species officially listed as endangered or threatened; or
  • Deer are overpopulated on property the entity owns or manages, and recreational hunting is not feasible for controlling that population.

The department may inspect the habitat or property to assess management plans, overpopulation and whether recreational hunting is feasible. An authorized representative must submit a written, sworn permit application stating the relevant facts and agreeing to follow the law and commission rules. Applying is not the same as receiving permission.

The existing permit framework remains important: a permit specifies its duration, area, wildlife species and number, and the people authorized to act. The application fee is $50 or a higher amount set by the commission. Existing carcass-donation rules prohibit the permit holder or authorized person from keeping or selling parts, including antlers. Permit conditions, reporting duties and enforcement provisions remain. Application and permit rules; permit terms; disposition of wildlife

HB2842 also creates a narrow exception to the hunting-for-hire prohibition for an eligible entity employing someone to perform the authorized deer control under such a permit, and for that employee. It does not repeal the general prohibition. The commission gains express rulemaking authority over the means, methods, times and locations of killing protected wildlife under this permit subchapter. Hunting-for-hire provision

The existing route for serious agricultural damage or threats to public safety remains separate. The special mandatory inspection requirements for mule deer, pronghorn and desert bighorn sheep are not converted into an automatic inspection requirement for every white-tailed-deer application.

What changed along the way?

The House substitute made a small but useful wording change: the inspection provision refers to overpopulation on “the property,” rather than “the entity’s property.” That fits the notice provision, which already covers property an entity owns or manages. The main permit expansion and paid-control exception were in the filed proposal. The House-passed, Senate committee and final operative texts match the substitute. Filed text; all versions

The amendment index lists no floor amendments. The House passed the bill 106–28, with one present but not voting; the Senate passed it 31–0. It became law without the governor’s signature, filed June 22, 2025—not by gubernatorial signature. Official history

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Habitat managers, communities and eligible associations gain a permit option where deer threaten protected habitat or recreational hunting cannot feasibly address overpopulation. Protected species and vegetation may benefit if the work achieves its conservation purpose. The tradeoff is the killing of deer, with possible community disagreement and costs for applications, contractors, oversight and lawful carcass disposition. The bill does not establish that lethal control is necessary at any particular site.

The May 15 fiscal note, the latest listed, anticipates no significant state or local fiscal effect and assumes administrative costs fit existing resources. The March 22 and April 4 notes agree. No statewide deer-removal target, quantified habitat benefit or reimbursement program is specified.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.