← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB285
HB285 adds criminal negligence to the mental states that can support a prosecution for cruelty to nonlivestock animals.
Official caption: Relating to the prosecution of the offense of cruelty to nonlivestock animals.
Official report lists House author(s): Ordaz, Leach, Meyer, Moody, Cook. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB285 adds criminal negligence to the mental states that can support a prosecution for cruelty to nonlivestock animals.
- Criminal negligence is more than an ordinary mistake.
- The added mental state applies to the section's existing nine categories of conduct: torture or cruel killing/serious injury; killing, poisoning or serious injury without the owner's effective consent; unreasonable failures to provide necessities; unreasonable abandonment; cruel transport or confinement; bodily injury without the owner's effective consent; causing animals to fight when either is not a dog; using a live animal as a lure in the specified dog-racing activities; and serious overwork.
- The act adds a defense specifically to alleged criminal negligence for conduct during the actual discharge of duties while employed as a Texas-licensed veterinarian or as someone assisting the veterinarian.
- The underlying section covers domesticated animals, including stray or feral cats and dogs, and previously captured wild animals; it excludes livestock and uncaptured wild animals.
What does it do?
HB285 adds criminal negligence to the mental states that can support a prosecution for cruelty to nonlivestock animals. Previously, the section required intentional, knowing or reckless conduct. The bill became law without the governor’s signature on June 20, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025. It applies only to offenses committed on or after that date; if any element occurred earlier, the former law governs. Final act · Official history
Criminal negligence is more than an ordinary mistake. Texas law requires that the person should have recognized a substantial and unjustifiable risk, and that failing to perceive it was a gross departure from the care an ordinary person would exercise in the circumstances viewed from the actor’s standpoint. Recklessness, by contrast, involves awareness and conscious disregard of such a risk. HB285 allows the former route as well; it does not make every accidental injury a crime. Penal Code Section 6.03(c)–(d)
The added mental state applies to the section’s existing nine categories of conduct: torture or cruel killing/serious injury; killing, poisoning or serious injury without the owner’s effective consent; unreasonable failures to provide necessities; unreasonable abandonment; cruel transport or confinement; bodily injury without the owner’s effective consent; causing animals to fight when either is not a dog; using a live animal as a lure in the specified dog-racing activities; and serious overwork. The section’s other requirements still apply. Final act, Section 1
The act adds a defense specifically to alleged criminal negligence for conduct during the actual discharge of duties while employed as a Texas-licensed veterinarian or as someone assisting the veterinarian. It is not a blanket exemption for intentional, knowing or reckless cruelty, and a defense is not an automatic bar to charges. Under the general defense rule, supporting evidence is required before the issue goes to the jury, and a reasonable doubt on that defense requires acquittal. New Section 42.092(d-1) · Defense procedure
The underlying section covers domesticated animals, including stray or feral cats and dogs, and previously captured wild animals; it excludes livestock and uncaptured wild animals. HB285 does not change the existing offense grades, which vary by conduct and prior convictions, or remove the section’s other defenses and exceptions. Full Section 42.092
What changed along the way?
Both the criminal-negligence addition and veterinary-duty defense were in the filed bill. Comparing the filed, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and final texts shows no substantive changes to its three sections. Both committees reported it without amendments, and the official amendment index lists none. Filed text · House report · House-passed text · Senate report · Amendment index
The House passed HB285 May 2 by 125–5, with two present but not voting. The Senate passed it May 23 by 31–0. Its later filing without the governor’s signature still made it law; it was not a veto. Final certificates · Official history
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Animals and their owners may benefit if the change allows prosecution of seriously harmful conduct where proof shows criminal negligence but not awareness of the risk. People responsible for animals face broader criminal exposure. Veterinary workers receive a defense for the newly covered mental state when the stated employment-duty conditions are met. The law does not establish how many additional cases will be brought or how much animal harm will be prevented. Final act
Investigators, prosecutors, courts and correctional agencies may face additional work. The Legislative Budget Board anticipated no significant state fiscal implication or significant effect on correctional populations and resources. It also assumed no significant local enforcement, prosecution, supervision or confinement impact. These are fiscal assumptions, not a finding that the legal expansion has no consequences for individual defendants or victims. Latest posted fiscal note, May 18
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.