2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB2963

HB2963 requires manufacturers of covered consumer electronics to make repair documentation, replacement parts and tools available to owners and independent repair businesses on defined fair and reasonable terms.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to diagnosis, maintenance, and repair of certain digital electronic equipment.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Capriglione, Curry, Hayes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB2963 requires manufacturers of covered consumer electronics to make repair documentation, replacement parts and tools available to owners and independent repair businesses on defined fair and reasonable terms. It is not a right to repair every electronic product. The law took effect September 1, 2026 and applies only to equipment originally made available for sale in Texas by its manufacturer on or after that date. Covered equipment must be sold to a consumer in Texas and have a wholesale price of at least $50—not merely a $50 retail price. “Consumer” means an individual buying primarily for personal, family or household purposes. Final law, Sections 1–4; official history.

For covered equipment, the manufacturer has no later than one year after its first sale in Texas to make the required materials, or equivalents, available. Availability cannot depend on the recipient becoming an authorized repair provider. Documentation and updates generally must be free, although printed copies may carry reasonable actual preparation and delivery costs. Replacement parts must be offered at costs and terms equivalent to those available to authorized repair providers. Tools must be free to use or operate, or priced at the manufacturer’s lowest actual authorized-provider cost, accounting for discounts and incentives; a physical tool may carry actual procurement, preparation and shipping costs. The law also requires terms fair to all parties. Sections 121.001(7) and 121.051.

Manufacturers may supply materials directly or through permitted repair providers or other third parties. The law does not impose a separate supply duty on a third party independent of the manufacturer. An independent repair provider must operate in Texas and not be an authorized provider or affiliated with one for that manufacturer.

Important exclusions: the law excludes information-technology equipment intended for critical infrastructure; powersports vehicles and outboard motors; specified medical devices or products; aerospace, airplane and train equipment; heavy equipment; commercial and industrial electrical equipment and associated parts; specified home appliances; emergency-service safety communications equipment; fire alarms, monitored intrusion equipment, life-safety and physical-access systems; and video-game consoles. The home-appliance exclusion does not extend to other countertop or stand-alone small appliances. General-purpose computers, laptops, tablets and mobile phones are not “video-game consoles” merely because they can play games. The motor-vehicle-manufacturer and farm-equipment-manufacturer exclusions depend on compliance with an applicable repair memorandum or industry-recognized agreement. Another exclusion covers a manufacturer providing an equivalent or better readily available replacement part free, at the consumer’s discretion. Section 121.002.

Access has further limits. The act does not require supplying materials that the manufacturer does not provide or make available to authorized repairers, including solely in-house or affiliate repairs; materials no longer available to the manufacturer; or certain tools/documentation used only for free remote diagnosis, unless also supplied to an unaffiliated business or individual. It does not require source code, materials for modifications rather than restoration to working order, unlawful repairs, or tools overriding protected security measures. Trade secrets need not be disclosed except as necessary for repair access under the chapter. Manufacturers may still require remote authorization or an internet connection and may supply qualifying preassembled parts rather than individual components. A claimed life-or-health safety exception requires physical evidence of the threat. Large-scale factory-only tools may be withheld if sufficient repair alternatives are supplied. Section 121.052.

For an owner who is the original purchaser, the manufacturer may instead reimburse the original purchase price or offer an equivalent-or-better readily available replacement device at a price no greater than the total cost of the replacement parts, with the replacement provided at the consumer’s discretion. This is a manufacturer alternative under the act, not an unconditional consumer right to demand a free new device. Contract terms waiving the manufacturer’s duties generally are unenforceable, but conflicting provisions in manufacturer–authorized-repair-provider agreements made before September 1, 2026 prevail under the act’s transition rule. Section 121.053 and act Section 3.

Only the attorney general may enforce this chapter; it creates no private lawsuit right. Before suit, the attorney general must give written notice identifying the alleged violations and at least 30 days to cure. Timely correction plus a written statement that the violation was cured and that no further violations are intended bars the action. Uncured violations can be pursued as deceptive trade practices or through an injunction, with recovery of reasonable investigation and litigation expenses and attorney’s fees. Sections 121.101–121.104.

What changed along the way?

The filed bill limited coverage to retail consumer equipment needing repair outside the manufacturer’s warranty. The House committee substitute removed those retail-only and out-of-warranty conditions, proposed including educational institutions as consumers, added and revised exclusions, required physical evidence for the life-or-health safety exception, and made the replacement-device alternative subject to consumer discretion. It also defined video-game consoles separately from general-purpose computers and excluded heavy equipment and specified security systems.

There were two indexed floor amendments, both adopted in their respective chambers, but only one survived:

  • Capriglione’s House amendment, May 9: restored the consumer definition to individuals acting primarily for personal, family or household purposes and removed the higher-education definition. The House committee’s proposed school/institution coverage did not become law, even though unused school-related definitions remain. House amendment.
  • Johnson’s Senate amendment, May 28: proposed barring parts-pairing software from blocking otherwise functional replacement parts, reducing equipment performance, or producing misleading replacement-part warnings that cannot immediately be dismissed. It also added a related security/safety qualification. Those provisions were removed in conference and are not in the final law. Senate amendment; conference report, PDF pages 19–21.

Separately, the Senate committee substitute expanded the autocycle/motorcycle exclusion to the defined powersports category and outboard motors. That change survived conference. Both chambers approved the conference agreement June 1, 2025; the governor signed June 20. Amendment index; text-version index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Owners of qualifying newer electronics and independent repair businesses could gain access to materials previously limited to authorized repair networks. Manufacturers must arrange qualifying access, prices and compliance procedures, while the many exclusions, supply limits, delayed availability deadline and original-purchaser alternatives limit that obligation. The act does not guarantee cheaper repairs, indefinite parts availability, or coverage for a device introduced before September 1, 2026 merely because someone buys it later.

The act shields manufacturers and authorized repair providers from specified injuries and losses resulting from independent or owner repairs and other use of supplied materials, including lost data, privacy, profits or functionality. Manufacturers also receive protections for reasonably necessary privacy/security measures and for data misuse or breaches connected with independent or owner repairs. These provisions allocate risks; they do not certify an independent repair as safe. Section 121.054.

The May 31 conference fiscal note anticipates no significant fiscal impact to the state or local governments, assuming costs can be absorbed within existing resources. It notes the attorney general’s ability to recover fees and enforcement expenses. It does not calculate consumer savings, manufacturers’ private compliance costs or repair-business revenue, and the act makes no separate appropriation.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.