2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3010

HB3010 directs the Texas Division of Emergency Management to establish grants for rebuilding or repairing disaster-damaged critical infrastructure in qualifying rural communities.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the establishment of the Rural Infrastructure Disaster Recovery Program.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Ashby, Lambert, Darby, Spiller. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3010 directs the Texas Division of Emergency Management to establish grants for rebuilding or repairing disaster-damaged critical infrastructure in qualifying rural communities. But the dedicated account written into this bill was abolished by the separate funds-consolidation law, HB4488. The comptroller explicitly lists HB3010’s account among those that will not be created. Do not read the account language in HB3010 alone as proof that a funded, protected account exists. HB3010 final law; comptroller’s funds-consolidation guidance, “Items NOT Exempted”.

Under HB3010’s grant framework, a county must meet all of these conditions: population under 100,000; gross domestic product under $2 billion; poverty rate greater than 15 percent; location wholly or partly in a governor-declared disaster area; and assessed disaster damages exceeding 10 percent of the state and local sales-and-use taxes collected in the county during the preceding state fiscal year. That last threshold is not 10 percent of the county’s budget or property value.

Other political subdivisions wholly or partly in a qualifying county may also apply. The bill expressly includes municipalities, special districts, school districts and junior-college districts, rather than limiting the program to counties and incorporated cities under the chapter’s general definition. Eligible status allows an application; it does not guarantee an award.

Grants are for repairing or rebuilding critical infrastructure damaged by a disaster reasonably considered a public calamity. The statutory examples include roads, public schools, hospitals and other health facilities, water-intake and treatment facilities, wastewater plants, pump stations, utility-scale water or wastewater systems, and specified airport facilities. Grant proceeds cannot be diverted to unrelated purposes. An application must describe the project, estimate its total cost, provide documentation that it does not qualify for FEMA funding, and include other eligibility information requested by the division. This is not a general replacement for available federal disaster aid.

HB3010 directs the division to establish application and award procedures by rule and permits grants using money appropriated for the program. The bill’s proposed account would have held legislative money, gifts/grants and investment earnings and paid grants plus necessary, reasonable administration costs. HB4488 overrides that dedicated-account arrangement: unexempted revenue instead goes to undedicated general revenue. The comptroller explains that any appropriation from an abolished account is established in general revenue. This does not itself erase HB3010’s program provisions, supply an appropriation or establish that applications or funding are presently available. HB4488, Sections 2, 9 and 16.

HB3010 took effect September 1, 2025, after being signed June 20. Official history.

What changed along the way?

The filed bill already proposed the rural eligibility tests, disaster-repair grants and account. The House committee substitute added the required documentation that a project does not qualify for FEMA funding, expressly allowed necessary and reasonable grant-administration expenses, and added the rulemaking requirement.

The House-passed, Senate and final versions retain those changes. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. The committee substitute and the separate effect of HB4488 are different events, not floor amendments to HB3010. Text-version index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Qualifying low-income rural communities could receive help restoring essential facilities that lack FEMA eligibility. Local applicants must document the county-level economic and damage tests and project costs, while state administrators must evaluate eligibility and control spending. The law does not offer direct household rebuilding grants or promise complete reimbursement of local damage.

The May 22 fiscal note anticipated no significant state fiscal impact and a positive but undetermined effect on eligible rural local governments. It specifically warned that the proposed account was subject to funds-consolidation review. That warning matters: the subsequent enacted consolidation measure did not exempt the account. The fiscal note is not an appropriation, a grant-award total or proof that all program costs are zero.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.