← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB3153
HB3153 adds screening, hiring and training safeguards for people who may have direct contact with children in specified facilities.
Official caption: Relating to hiring and employment requirements for persons in direct contact with children at certain facilities.
Official report lists House author(s): Kerwin. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB3153 adds screening, hiring and training safeguards for people who may have direct contact with children in specified facilities.
- The requirements reach selected applicants and current employees, volunteers and independent contractors whose positions potentially involve caring for, supervising, guiding, controlling or routinely interacting with a child receiving services.
- A facility that submits each covered person's name for a background and criminal-history check in accordance with Human Resources Code 42.056 and its rules is considered compliant with this screening section.
- A facility must not offer, and must terminate, a covered position when the specified review or verification reveals that the person engaged in child abuse constituting one of four listed Penal Code offenses: continuous sexual abuse, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault or prohibited sexual conduct.
- Separation agreements entered into on or after September 1, 2025 cannot prohibit disclosure to a prospective employer of conduct constituting the listed offenses.
- The governor signed June 20, 2025.
What does it do?
HB3153 adds screening, hiring and training safeguards for people who may have direct contact with children in specified facilities. It covers HHSC-regulated residential treatment facilities and group homes, Texas Juvenile Justice Department-regulated juvenile detention facilities, and homeless shelters operated by or under a county or city’s authority. The responsible state agency, county or city must ensure the facilities it regulates or operates perform the required checks. This is not a universal rule for every workplace or every private shelter. Final law.
The requirements reach selected applicants and current employees, volunteers and independent contractors whose positions potentially involve caring for, supervising, guiding, controlling or routinely interacting with a child receiving services. Facilities must review state criminal-history information and verify employment, contacting former employers listed in application materials to the extent possible. They must obtain electronic DPS arrest and conviction updates for covered continuing personnel.
A facility that submits each covered person’s name for a background and criminal-history check in accordance with Human Resources Code 42.056 and its rules is considered compliant with this screening section. That is a specified alternative compliance route—not permission to skip background screening, and not an exemption from the separate hiring and training provisions. HHSC may adopt implementing rules, including rules recognizing qualifying existing employment-verification procedures. Referenced background-check law.
A facility must not offer, and must terminate, a covered position when the specified review or verification reveals that the person engaged in child abuse constituting one of four listed Penal Code offenses: continuous sexual abuse, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault or prohibited sexual conduct. The operative test is discovery of the specified conduct, not simply any arrest or an unsupported allegation. Despite the section’s conviction-related heading, the operative text does not say that only a conviction can establish the disqualifying conduct.
Separation agreements entered into on or after September 1, 2025 cannot prohibit disclosure to a prospective employer of conduct constituting the listed offenses. Facilities must also train covered personnel to recognize abuse, understand reporting requirements and facility reporting policies, and maintain appropriate professional relationships with children. The act sets no specific number of training hours.
The governor signed June 20, 2025. The law took effect September 1, 2025. Official history.
What changed along the way?
The filed bill, retained in the House committee report, required state and federal criminal-history review and included disqualification based on an earlier termination over abuse allegations. Kerwin’s adopted House amendment removed the federal-review wording from the new section, qualified former-employer contacts with “to the extent possible,” removed the separate allegation-based termination trigger and narrowed the agreement provision from allegations to conduct. It did not abolish federal checks required by other law.
The Senate substitute limited applicant screening to people selected for the positions, added the existing-law compliance route and HHSC rulemaking authority, and included that background-check route in the hiring restriction. The Senate amendment packet contains the adopted substitute; its substance matches the enrolled law. The House concurred May 28. Amendment index; all text versions.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Children and families may benefit from better screening, continuing alerts, clearer training and fewer contractual barriers to sharing specified misconduct with prospective employers. Facilities must administer checks, handle sensitive records, train personnel and make employment decisions on the statutory grounds. Workers and applicants benefit from the removal of the proposal’s separate allegation-based trigger, but are still subject to the enacted conduct-based rule and other applicable laws.
The final May 24 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal impact, assuming state costs can be absorbed with existing resources. Earlier versions were estimated to cost about $2.23 million over 2026–27 and require nine additional state employees; that is not the final version’s estimate. No appropriation is made, and the final note does not quantify every facility’s compliance costs.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.