← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB3180
HB3180 corrects a word in the Family Code's list of information a party may request from another party in a civil case.
Official caption: Relating to the contents of a request for disclosure in a civil action brought under the Family Code.
Official report lists House author(s): Dutton. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB3180 corrects a word in the Family Code's list of information a party may request from another party in a civil case.
- Under the referenced rule, a witness statement includes a written statement signed or adopted or approved in writing by its maker, or a recording of an oral statement and a substantially word-for-word transcription.
- This is a correction within an existing request-based discovery process—the process for obtaining information from another party during litigation.
- The governor signed June 20, 2025.
What does it do?
HB3180 corrects a word in the Family Code’s list of information a party may request from another party in a civil case. The provision now says a discoverable “witness statement”, rather than “witness settlement,” described by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.3(h). That rule concerns statements, while the neighboring statutory item already covers discoverable settlement agreements. Final law.
Under the referenced rule, a witness statement includes a written statement signed or adopted or approved in writing by its maker, or a recording of an oral statement and a substantially word-for-word transcription. Interview notes are not automatically witness statements under that definition. The rule concerns people with knowledge of relevant facts. Official civil-procedure rules, Rule 192.3(g)–(h).
This is a correction within an existing request-based discovery process—the process for obtaining information from another party during litigation. It does not require publishing family-case materials online, automatically turn every private conversation into a discoverable statement, or rewrite the whole disclosure list. The word “discoverable” remains an important limit. Existing request procedure.
The governor signed June 20, 2025. The law took effect September 1, 2025 and applies both to cases already pending in a trial court on that date and cases filed afterward. It is not limited to newly filed cases. Official history.
What changed along the way?
The filed bill already made this correction and included the same pending-case application and effective date. The House report, House-passed text, Senate report and enrolled law kept those provisions substantively unchanged. The amendment index lists no amendments; both committees reported it without amendments. All versions.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Parties, lawyers and courts gain clearer statutory wording that matches the referenced court rule. This can reduce confusion over what the disclosure request covers. The act does not guarantee that every requested statement must be produced or decide whether a particular document meets the rule.
The May 20 fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local-government fiscal impact, assuming implementation uses existing resources. It does not estimate individual parties’ litigation costs. No appropriation is made.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.