2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3228

HB3228 requires covered new wind and solar leases to put responsibility for reusable, recyclable and waste components on the facility operator, and to include those costs in cleanup financial assurance.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the inclusion of certain provisions in lease agreements for wind or solar power facilities.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Lambert, Slawson, Patterson, Kitzman. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3228 requires covered new wind and solar leases to put responsibility for reusable, recyclable and waste components on the facility operator, and to include those costs in cleanup financial assurance. It applies to agreements entered into on or after September 1, 2025; earlier agreements remain under former law. The governor signed June 20, 2025. Final law; history.

The lease must require the operator to collect and reuse or recycle—or ship for reuse or recycling—all components practicably capable of it, expressly including wind-turbine blades and solar photovoltaic modules. Recycling means processing an item to recover a usable product. Components not practicably reusable or recyclable must go to a facility legally authorized for that waste: hazardous components to an authorized hazardous-substance disposal facility, and nonhazardous components to an authorized municipal landfill or other appropriate disposal facility. The law neither labels every component hazardous nor requires recycling when it is not practicable.

The act expands the costs included in financial assurance—the guarantee, bond, letter of credit or other permitted backing for cleanup—to cover recycling or disposal as well as removal and restoration. The minimum remains based on estimated costs and salvage value, with the statutory adjustment for facility value pledged to outstanding debt. It is not a fixed dollar bond or an automatic cash payment to the landowner. Independent Texas-licensed professional engineers determine the estimates; the operator pays for the assurance and cost estimates and must keep the assurance sufficient.

Existing timing rules remain important. Wind estimates must be updated at least every five years. Solar estimate language requires an update on or before the tenth anniversary of commercial operations and at least once every five years after the commercial-operations date; HB3228 does not rewrite that timing language. Separate unchanged provisions require delivery of the assurance by the earlier of lease termination or the tenth anniversary for wind, and the earlier of termination or the twentieth anniversary for solar. An estimate deadline is not the same as the deadline to deliver the assurance. Wind assurance; solar assurance.

The definitions expressly address turbine components and battery energy storage supporting wind or solar operations. These are lease-based requirements, not a general rule for every standalone battery or rooftop panel. The solar chapter applies to generation assets and retains its exclusions for the defined electric utility and utility-owned supporting equipment. Existing rules make waivers of the chapters’ rights and duties void and allow an injured person to seek appropriate court orders to stop violations. Solar scope.

What changed along the way?

The core recycling/disposal and financial-assurance changes were present in the filed bill and remained unchanged through House passage. The Senate committee substitute revised both facility definitions to use “battery energy storage facility or other energy storage facility.” The House concurred, and the final law contains those changes. All versions.

The floor-amendment index lists no individual amendments. That does not mean there were no changes between chambers: the Senate amendments packet contains the adopted substitute. Its operative text matches the Senate-reported and enrolled versions. The substitute is distinct from a separately numbered floor amendment.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Landowners may gain clearer protection against being left with component disposal expenses. Reuse and recycling businesses may gain work where recovery is practicable. Operators bear the added contractual duties and the cost of estimates and sufficient financial backing; how much that costs depends on the facility, component condition, salvage value and available lawful disposal or recycling options.

The May 19 final-stage fiscal note anticipated no significant state or local-government fiscal impact, assuming costs could be absorbed with existing resources. It does not estimate private cleanup costs, landowner savings or electricity-price effects. The bill does not appropriate money or establish a guaranteed recycling market.

Review boundary: All eight sections, the Senate substitute packet and the existing lease/removal/assurance framework were reviewed. This does not classify an individual component as hazardous, decide what recycling is practicable for a project, or give a dollar assurance calculation for a particular lease.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.