2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3229

HB3229 requires covered renewable-energy recycling facilities to report their unrecycled inventory and provide financial backing for its recycling or disposal.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to recycling of certain renewable energy components; authorizing an administrative penalty.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Lambert, Slawson, Darby. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3229 requires covered renewable-energy recycling facilities to report their unrecycled inventory and provide financial backing for its recycling or disposal. The governor signed May 29, 2025; it took effect September 1, 2025. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) administers the new requirements. Final law; history.

The chapter applies to recycling facilities that accept, process and repurpose components to recover valuable materials from wind turbines, solar-energy devices or battery-energy storage systems. Its component lists include turbine blades and drivetrains, solar modules and inverters, and battery cells, containers, management systems, cooling/fire-suppression systems and cables. This is a recycler requirement, not a blanket reporting duty on everyone who owns a solar panel or battery.

Owners must report to TCEQ by January 15 each year, providing:

  • An inventory of accepted components not yet recycled, including components the facility owns or controls even if stored elsewhere.
  • An estimated recycling or disposal timeline.
  • A recycling or disposal cost estimate prepared by an independent, third-party professional engineer licensed in Texas.

With the first report, the owner must provide evidence of financial assurance equal to 100% of the estimated cost. Each later report must include any additional assurance needed to keep the amount on file at least equal to the updated estimate. Permitted forms are a qualifying investment-grade parent-company guarantee, a letter of credit or a bond—not necessarily a cash deposit.

TCEQ must maintain an online list of facilities complying with the chapter. A person may not accept, process or repurpose the covered components for compensation without complying. TCEQ may assess an administrative penalty up to $500 per day for each violation; that is a ceiling, not an automatic charge. Existing penalty rules allow continuing violations to be counted by day and require consideration of relevant circumstances. Penalty framework.

What changed along the way?

The filed bill required 125% financial assurance and referred to recycling costs and timelines. The House committee substitute reduced that to 100%, added disposal as an alternative in the timeline and cost estimate, and removed a separate sentence explicitly assigning estimation and assurance costs to the owner. The final law still places the reporting and assurance-submission duties on the owner; deletion of that sentence does not supply public reimbursement.

Those substitute changes remained in the House-passed, Senate-reported and final versions. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. The 125% figure is an earlier proposal, not the enacted requirement. Version index.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Financial backing and inventory reporting may reduce the risk that accepted components are abandoned without resources for processing or disposal. Facilities face reporting, engineering-estimate and financial-assurance burdens. The law does not guarantee that every component will be recycled or that assurance will cover every eventual expense.

The May 9 fiscal note says the overall state fiscal effect could not be determined, because the number and amount of penalties were unknown. It nevertheless identifies $650,000 in fiscal 2026 technology costs from the General Revenue-Dedicated Waste Management Account: $220,000 for electronic reporting, $330,000 for an internal database and $100,000 for web reporting. Other implementation costs were assumed absorbable with existing resources. Local-government effects were also undetermined.

The bill makes no appropriation, although it can provide a legal basis for one. The technology estimate is not an enacted payment, a penalty-revenue forecast or an estimate of each recycler’s private costs.

Review boundary: All four enacted sections, all versions, the fiscal notes and penalty cross-reference checked. This describes the legal requirements, not a finding that a named facility is compliant or that TCEQ has collected a particular penalty.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.