2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB33

HB33 requires schools and emergency agencies to prepare, coordinate, train and learn from responses to school shootings.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to active shooter incidents at primary and secondary school facilities and other emergencies.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): McLaughlin, Guillen, Moody, Leo Wilson, Louderback. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB33 requires schools and emergency agencies to prepare, coordinate, train and learn from responses to school shootings. The Uvalde Strong Act was signed June 20, 2025, and took effect September 1, 2025, with several later implementation deadlines. It is not a finding that any particular school or agency now complies. Final law; official history.

Schools and facilities. School districts must promptly review security when they construct, acquire, renovate or improve a facility, identifying vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies under state rules. The law extends this requirement to open-enrollment charter schools, adds security reviews to the existing three-year school-district and public-junior-college audit, and adds state education-agency monitoring. District and junior-college emergency plans must use standardized response terminology and address prompt restoration of services; covered higher-education institutions must also plan for restoring services. Each school-district and charter campus must have at least one breaching tool—a tool for forced entry—and ballistic shield available for an active-shooter incident. Sections 2–7.

Coordinated response. The Department of Public Safety (DPS) must consult sheriffs to identify governmental responders likely to attend a school-shooting incident. Those entities, sheriffs and DPS must collectively hold a tabletop exercise in each odd-numbered year and an in-person drill in each even-numbered year. Mutual-aid agreements must address shared resources, compatible communications, coordination, evidence collection and jurisdiction; the initial agreements were due January 1, 2026. Separately, sheriffs in every county with a public school must hold an annual school-safety meeting. Previously, that requirement applied only below 350,000 population and required two meetings annually. Attendance requirements differ above and below that population threshold. Sections 13–14, 20 and 25.

Learning after an incident. Responding local law-enforcement agencies and emergency-medical providers must submit a preliminary evaluation by day 45 and a final report by day 90, or as soon as practicable thereafter, to DPS, the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) and Texas State University’s Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center (ALERRT). Reports cover deployment, costs, logs, injuries and deaths, investigation status, response problems and improvements. Complying avoids a duplicate evaluation under the general post-disaster provision. Information TDEM or DPS obtains or creates under this provision is confidential, and the specified interagency meetings are exempt from open-meeting requirements; these are not promises of public after-action reports. The required incident definition follows the FBI’s active-shooter definition. Sections 8 and 11; FBI definition, first page.

Training and equipment. The law directs agency rules requiring school-incident response training for local peace officers and emergency-medical personnel, with findings from incident reports incorporated into training. ALERRT’s template and training program, TDEM’s emergency-medical program, and TDEM’s public community-preparedness guide were due December 1, 2025. Officer curriculum adds introductory incident-command and national incident-management courses; supervisors must take advanced response-and-command continuing education, without the specified second-in-command exemption. The curriculum change applies to officers first beginning those requirements on or after January 1, 2026; advanced continuing-education requirements apply to training units beginning on or after September 1, 2025. Law-enforcement minimum standards also add access to a breaching tool and ballistic shield and detailed school-incident policies; qualifying neighboring agencies may share protective equipment by agreement. Sections 8, 10–11, 16–19, 21–23 and 27–29.

Public communication and recovery. Municipalities, counties, independent school districts, charter schools, TDEM, DPS and the listed local law-enforcement offices must designate a public information officer; an existing chief administrator may fill that role. Certification is generally due within a year of appointment, followed by continuing education once each 12-month certification period. Officers already appointed before the law took effect had a September 1, 2026 deadline. TDEM sets requirements, and the entities covered by Section 418.332 must maintain and submit compliance records. The law also requires a first-responder mental-health resources plan, implementation by receiving local governments, and regional sharing. There is a drafting wrinkle: the permanent section assigns plan development to TDEM with health agencies, while Section 26 also directs councils of governments to develop a plan as soon as practicable. Both instructions remain in the enacted text; this review does not assume one cancels the other. Sections 9, 12, 15, 24 and 26.

What changed along the way?

The House substitute substantially revised the filed bill. It added campus tools and shields, ALERRT’s reporting/training role and confidentiality provisions; changed proposed 30/60-day reports to 45/90 days with practicability qualifications; reduced proposed public-information continuing education from twice to once annually; and replaced the proposed twice-yearly tabletop/annual drill schedule with alternating-year exercises. It moved response-policy and equipment requirements into law-enforcement standards, dropped the proposal to equip the greater of five officers or 20% of an agency, and removed proposed local-government emergency-system provisions. It also changed facility-review scope, sheriff meetings, mental-health-plan responsibilities and implementation dates. The House-passed text has no substantive difference from that substitute. Filed text; House substitute; House-passed text.

The Senate replaced accreditation grants with training grants. The final grant program assists first responders and emergency telecommunicators in attending ALERRT active-attack integrated response training or an approved similar course. The earlier $25,000 accreditation/$12,500 reaccreditation awards did not survive. The Senate committee text and final law otherwise have no substantive difference. Although the online amendment index says there are no amendments, the official Senate packet includes a complete substitute, stamped adopted May 19, and the House concurred May 23. That substitute was checked in full, not inferred from the index. Amendment index; Senate text; Senate packet, substitute PDF pages 31–59.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Students, staff, families and emergency responders could benefit from clearer coordination, shared training, ready equipment and recovery planning. Local schools and agencies must supply staff time, training, equipment, reviews and reporting. Confidentiality may protect sensitive response information but limits public access to the specified records and meetings. These are the law’s mechanisms and trade-offs, not proof that it has prevented an attack or corrected every response failure.

The final fiscal note could not determine the total cost: DPS anticipated potentially significant but unquantified costs; local costs were also unknown, and grant funding depended on appropriations. The earlier $139.9 million estimate for 2026–27 concerned the removed accreditation program, not the final training program. Separately, the enacted state budget appropriated $20 million in fiscal 2026 for the new training grants, contingent on HB33 or similar legislation; HB33 was enacted and that rider was not among the governor’s vetoes. This appropriation is not the total cost of HB33 or evidence that all funds have been awarded. Final fiscal note; earlier House-passed fiscal note; SB1, Article IX Section 18.03, PDF page 1003; governor’s veto proclamation.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.