2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3348

HB3348 authorizes certain counties to collect mandatory payments from nonpublic hospitals providing inpatient services, place the money in a separate local fund, and use it toward the nonfederal share of specified Medicaid paymen…

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the creation and operations of a health care provider participation program in certain counties.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Patterson, Plesa, Richardson, Troxclair. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3348 authorizes certain counties to collect mandatory payments from nonpublic hospitals providing inpatient services, place the money in a separate local fund, and use it toward the nonfederal share of specified Medicaid payments. The aim is to support hospital funding by making eligible local money available for federal matching funds—not to guarantee every hospital gets its payment back. The law took effect June 20, 2025. Final law; history.

A county must not be served by a hospital district and must meet one of three population/geography descriptions:

  • Category A: more than 46,000 but fewer than 50,000 residents, adjacent to the county containing the state capital.
  • Category B: at least 900,000 residents, bordering two counties that each have at least two million residents.
  • Category C: at least one million residents, containing all or part of a city of at least one million, and adjacent to a county of at least 2.5 million.

The county commissioners court may authorize participation by order; collecting payments requires a majority vote. Participation is not automatically imposed on every qualifying county. The official Senate analysis describes continuing Denton County’s hospital-funding arrangement as the original purpose, but the final statutory categories—not that description of intent—control eligibility. Senate analysis.

Once authorized, annual hospital payments must be assessed quarterly, uniformly in proportion to net patient revenue. The aggregate state-law ceiling is 6% of participating hospitals’ aggregate net patient revenue from hospital services; it is a ceiling, not a required rate or a guarantee of federal approval. First-year calculations use the latest reported state hospital data, or the latest Medicare cost report if state data were not reported; amounts are updated annually. Hospitals receive written assessments and must pay within 30 days of receipt. A hospital may not add the payment as a patient surcharge.

The fund may finance transfers to the state for specified uncompensated-care, directed-payment, similar waiver and other federally matchable hospital reimbursement purposes; authorized administration; and specified error or unused-funds refunds. It may not be mixed with other county money. Resulting funds may not support Affordable Care Act Medicaid eligibility expansion or the nonfederal share of the Medicaid disproportionate-share hospital program. The law does not authorize general-revenue fundraising or collections beyond reasonably necessary program and administrative amounts.

Annual administrative spending from these payments is capped at $20,000 for Category A, $150,000 for B, and $300,000 for C, plus collateralization of deposits—the cost of securing deposited funds. Collection agents may deduct usual-and-customary collection fees; if the collector is a county official, those fees go to the county general fund. Delinquent payments may carry interest and penalties within the county’s applicable maximums.

Each payment year requires a public hearing on amounts and spending, with newspaper notice and written hospital notice at least five days beforehand; hospital representatives have a right to be heard. Counties must obtain the hospitals’ required financial/utilization reports and may inspect records for compliance. They must report collections and uses to HHSC, which may issue reporting rules. Local administration may include rules on collections, spending and audits, and county funds must be secured in designated bank depositories.

Federal limits remain decisive. Collection is permitted only when a qualifying waiver, rate enhancement or reimbursement is available to the county. HHSC may refuse money that may violate federal law. The program cannot guarantee hospitals protection from their payment burden through prohibited “hold harmless” arrangements. Counties may adjust procedures to meet federal requirements, but cannot materially expand county or hospital legal/financial liability beyond this chapter. If federal permission is needed, the state agency must request it and may delay implementation until granted. State authorization alone is not federal approval.

What changed along the way?

The introduced and House committee texts matched. The House adopted Richardson’s amendment adding the large-county/city category and changing the other large-county threshold from more than 900,000 to at least 900,000. Troxclair’s third-reading amendment added the smaller county adjacent to the state-capital county. Both expansions survived, with the final categories reordered. Text versions; House second-reading amendment; House third-reading amendment.

The Senate committee substitute strengthened administration: it added record-inspection authority, HHSC reporting and refusal authority, and delinquency penalties; required annual payments assessed quarterly once a program is authorized; reorganized fund provisions; broadened the reimbursement language to include reimbursements benefiting nonpublic hospitals as determined by the county; and removed an express fund-use provision for federal-disallowance transfers. That removal should not be read as erasing any independent federal repayment obligation.

All three indexed Senate floor proposals were checked:

  • Paxton’s F1, adopted: replaced a uniform $150,000 administrative cap with the three category-specific caps above.
  • Hughes’s F2, withdrawn: proposed a separate Chapter 300C framework for certain jointly created health-care provider participation districts, including governance, finances, dissolution, hospital payments and transition from Chapter 300A. That separate district framework did not become part of HB3348.
  • Parker’s F3, adopted: replaced a fixed September 2025 start with immediate effect if the required votes were achieved. They were; the official history records June 20, 2025 immediate effect.

The House concurred in the Senate changes. Amendment index and dispositions; F1; withdrawn F2; F3.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Hospitals and their patients could benefit if the financing supports eligible Medicaid reimbursement and hospital services. Hospitals also bear mandatory payments, reporting work and possible collection costs; no hospital is promised a net gain. Counties take on administration and compliance work. The prohibition on adding a patient surcharge does not establish that all other hospital prices will remain unchanged.

The final available fiscal note anticipated no significant state fiscal impact, assuming existing resources could absorb state costs. It identified an impact on counties creating and running the funds but gave no dollar estimate. Earlier notes said no significant local impact; the final note’s more qualified assessment is the relevant one. None of these estimates is an appropriation or a forecast of individual hospital gains. Fiscal note.

Review boundary: This explains HB3348’s enacted state-law authority. It does not certify a county’s current eligibility, adoption order, assessment rate, federal approval or compliance with later federal financing changes. The 6% state ceiling must not be mistaken for blanket current federal permission.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.