2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3513

HB3513 changes who serves on the Moore County Juvenile Board and which statewide duties and staffing rules apply to it.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the composition, duties, and personnel of the Moore County Juvenile Board.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Fairly. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3513 changes who serves on the Moore County Juvenile Board and which statewide duties and staffing rules apply to it. The board now consists of the county judge, the judge of the County Court at Law of Moore County, and three to five members appointed by the commissioners court. Previously it had the county judge and six appointed members. The new structure therefore permits five to seven members and expressly includes the county-court-at-law judge. Final law

Appointed members have two-year terms ending December 31 of even-numbered years, unless the commissioners court votes to extend a member’s term by no more than two years. This replaces the former staggered arrangement, under which three appointed terms expired in odd-numbered years and three in even-numbered years. The bill does not name replacement members or set out a separate transition timetable for each incumbent.

The act removes Moore County’s exemption from Human Resources Code Sections 152.0007 and 152.0008. Those provisions require a juvenile probation department, a qualified chief probation officer, a juvenile-services budget and policies, including financial policies. They allow child-assessment guidelines covering mental health, family background and education, and require use of available school assessment information before a comprehensive psychological evaluation. Within the adopted budget, the chief officer may hire qualified assistant officers and other necessary staff; probation officers serve at the appointing authority’s pleasure. Duties and personnel provisions

The board still selects its chair and serves without compensation under unchanged law. Other listed exemptions, Sections 152.0002 through 152.0006, remain. Signed May 24, 2025, HB3513 took effect September 1, 2025. Official history

What changed along the way?

The introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions were compared. Their operative provisions are the same: change the membership and terms, and bring the board under the two statewide duties/personnel sections. Both committees reported the bill without amendments; the amendment index lists none. Introduced text · Text versions · Amendment index

These are governance and staffing changes, not new juvenile offenses or sentencing rules. Removing an exemption from duties and personnel provisions does not itself prove that Moore County previously lacked probation services.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

The board, probation staff and families involved in juvenile services may benefit from clearer responsibility for budgeting, staffing and assessments. Commissioners have flexibility over the number of appointed members within the statutory range. The changes do not guarantee a particular service improvement or outcome for a child.

County officials and probation leadership bear the work of adjusting membership, terms and administration. Both fiscal notes anticipated no significant state or local-government fiscal implication, assuming state costs could be absorbed with existing resources. No specific new funding or salary amount is appropriated. Fiscal note

The criminal-justice impact statement anticipated no significant effect on state correctional populations or resources and identified no new felony or increased felony punishment. Impact statement

Review boundary: This explains the legal changes, not verification of current appointments, local staffing levels or implementation decisions for an individual member’s term.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.