← Back to bills and search results
2025 · Regular session · House bill
HB3516
HB3516 extends an existing Public Information Act exception to administrative law judges and technical examiners at the Railroad Commission of Texas.
Official caption: Relating to the availability of certain working papers and electronic communications of certain administrative law judges and technical examiners under the public information law.
Official report lists House author(s): Dyson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.
Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.
Bill highlights
Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.
- HB3516 extends an existing Public Information Act exception to administrative law judges and technical examiners at the Railroad Commission of Texas.
- The covered material consists of notes and electronic communications recording the hearing officer's observations, thoughts, questions, deliberations or impressions; draft proposals for decision; draft orders for contested-case hearings; and draft orders for alternative-dispute-resolution proceedings.
- The act applies to public-information requests received on or after September 1, 2025, its effective date.
- The law creates an exception to required public disclosure, not a general instruction to destroy records or close hearings.
What does it do?
HB3516 extends an existing Public Information Act exception to administrative law judges and technical examiners at the Railroad Commission of Texas. The exception previously covered specified working papers and electronic communications of administrative law judges at the State Office of Administrative Hearings. Final law
The covered material consists of notes and electronic communications recording the hearing officer’s observations, thoughts, questions, deliberations or impressions; draft proposals for decision; draft orders for contested-case hearings; and draft orders for alternative-dispute-resolution proceedings. It is not a blanket exemption for all Railroad Commission records or every email.
The act applies to public-information requests received on or after September 1, 2025, its effective date. The dividing line is the request’s receipt date, not simply when a document was created. Requests received earlier do not gain this new exception from HB3516. The governor signed the bill June 20. Official history
The law creates an exception to required public disclosure, not a general instruction to destroy records or close hearings. Final opinions and orders remain separately addressed by the Public Information Act’s public-information provisions, subject to applicable confidentiality law; they are not made secret merely because drafts are covered. Public-information statute
What changed along the way?
The introduced, House committee, House-passed, Senate committee and enrolled versions were compared. The operative expansion and request-date rule stayed the same throughout. Both committees reported the bill without amendments, and no amendments are listed in the official amendment index. Introduced text · Text versions · Amendment index
The change extends the existing categories to the named Railroad Commission personnel; it does not establish a new general exemption for every agency employee’s deliberations.
For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.
Official bill versions
Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.
Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?
Railroad Commission hearing officers gain protection for the specified internal notes and drafts, which can support candid deliberation. People seeking to scrutinize the development of a decision—including parties, journalists and members of the public—may have less access to those materials. That trade-off is narrower than losing access to the entire proceeding or its final decision.
Both fiscal notes anticipated no significant state or local-government fiscal implication, assuming costs could be absorbed with existing resources. They assign no dollar value to the transparency effects or the value of protected deliberations and make no appropriation. Fiscal note
Review boundary: This explains the new exception and its timing, not a decision on an individual records request, another confidentiality provision or litigation-discovery rights.
Official sources
- Bill history and latest recorded action
- Bill versions, analyses and fiscal notes
- Action history and votes
- Amendment index
Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.
