2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3556

HB3556 requires advance Texas Parks and Wildlife Department review of structures taller than 575 feet in a limited group of counties.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the construction of structures exceeding a certain height in certain counties containing national wildlife refuges and in adjacent counties.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Vasut, Metcalf, Leo Wilson. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

HB3556 requires advance Texas Parks and Wildlife Department review of structures taller than 575 feet in a limited group of counties.
The builder must request review at least 90 days before construction.
The Parks and Wildlife Commission may adopt implementing rules.
For practical implementation, TPWD publishes a county list and submission checklist.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3556 requires advance Texas Parks and Wildlife Department review of structures taller than 575 feet in a limited group of counties. It applies only to counties with fewer than 500,000 people that either border the Gulf of Mexico and contain all or part of a national wildlife refuge, or are adjacent to such a county and do not contain a city with more than 300,000 people. This is not a statewide height limit or a rule limited to wind turbines. Final law.

The builder must request review at least 90 days before construction. TPWD has 45 days after receiving the request to recommend measures to reduce harm to migratory birds. If it misses that deadline, the statute says the project may proceed without further delay or modification. If recommendations arrive, the requester has 45 days to accept them or propose alternatives. If TPWD disagrees with the alternatives, it has 45 days after receiving them to decide what measures are required. A requester who has not agreed to those measures is entitled to a hearing before the State Office of Administrative Hearings.

The Parks and Wildlife Commission may adopt implementing rules. Information submitted under this section is outside the Texas Public Information Act. The law took effect September 1, 2025, and applies to construction beginning on or after the 90th day after that date. It does not itself waive other environmental or construction requirements. Official history.

For practical implementation, TPWD publishes a county list and submission checklist. Its guidance says the review clock starts when it determines a request is complete; that is agency guidance, while the enacted text describes receipt of a request. Applicants should consult the current checklist rather than assume an incomplete submission starts the clock. TPWD guidance.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill used a 500-foot threshold and a notification-and-court-injunction approach to wildlife damage. The House committee version moved the provision into Parks and Wildlife Code Chapter 12 and retained injunction authority. The House adopted both indexed floor amendments: Villalobos added the large-city exclusion for adjacent counties; Darby substituted the migratory-bird review and response process, allowed alternatives to impractical recommendations, added a strict consent-based disclosure restriction, and changed the construction transition period to 180 days. Those changes appear in the House-passed text. Amendments and dispositions.

The Senate committee substitute restored injunction provisions, including consideration of cumulative project impacts, removed the extra consent-based disclosure restriction, returned the transition period to 90 days, and added a spaceflight-facility exemption. Middleton’s adopted Senate floor amendment replaced the injunction provisions with a final agency decision and administrative hearing. Complete Senate amendment packet.

The conference agreement raised the threshold from 500 to 575 feet, specifically assigned disputed-measure hearings to the State Office of Administrative Hearings, added rulemaking authority, and omitted the spaceflight exemption. It kept the 90-day transition period and the Public Information Act exclusion, but not the House’s additional ban on disclosure without consent. Both chambers adopted the conference agreement; the earlier special injunction powers are not in the enacted law. Conference report; House permission for the conference changes; Senate permission.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Migratory birds and people who value coastal wildlife could benefit from earlier identification and reduction of construction impacts. Developers gain specified response deadlines and a hearing process, but must budget time and potentially money for review materials and protective measures. Those private costs are not quantified in the fiscal notes. The records exclusion also limits public access to submitted project information; it is not a general exemption for all TPWD records.

The final fiscal note anticipates no significant state or local government fiscal impact and assumes agencies can absorb costs within existing resources. That does not establish that compliance is free for developers or predict the number of projects affected. Final fiscal note.

Review boundary: This explanation covers the enacted requirements and the documented proposal changes, not a determination that a particular site qualifies or that a project has satisfied all necessary approvals. TPWD’s implementation guidance may change; statutory county and height thresholds remain the starting point.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.