2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills and search results

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3805

HB3805 gives the Texas banking commissioner specific authority to remove or bar certain people from money-services businesses and other entities the commissioner regulates.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to certain enforcement powers of the banking commissioner regarding the regulation of money services businesses.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Lambert. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3805 gives the Texas banking commissioner specific authority to remove or bar certain people from money-services businesses and other entities the commissioner regulates. It took effect immediately on June 20, 2025. Money services include money transmission and currency exchange; a “key individual” is someone with ultimate responsibility for setting policy or directing operations. Final law and Chapter 152.

Misconduct-based removal requires more than an allegation or ordinary mistake. New Section 152.411 covers a current or former key individual or employee, a controlling person, or another person participating in a licensee’s affairs. The commissioner must find all three kinds of facts:

  • Specified misconduct: intentionally committing the criminal acts covered by Section 152.408; intentionally committing, participating in or causing a licensee’s conduct covered by Section 152.403; violating a final state or federal cease-and-desist order; or making false entries in a licensee’s records.
  • A resulting or probable financial loss or other damage, prejudice to customers, creditors or shareholders—including holders of outstanding money-transmission obligations—or personal gain or benefit to the person.
  • Personal dishonesty or willful or continuing disregard for the licensee’s safety or soundness.

If necessary and in the public interest, the commissioner may propose removal or prohibit participation in a money-services licensee or any other entity chartered, registered, permitted or licensed by the commissioner. An order may be permanent, time-limited, suspended subject to conditions, or otherwise conditional. The ordinary notice and hearing procedures in Section 152.409 apply; an uncontested order becomes final and nonappealable when effective. This is not a blanket automatic lifetime ban for every regulatory violation. Enforcement and procedures.

A separate route applies to qualifying final felony convictions. Under Section 152.412, a felony must involve the money-services business, dishonesty or breach of trust. “Conviction” includes qualifying sentences, probation/community supervision including deferred adjudication, and deferred final disposition, but only when the matter is no longer subject to further appellate review. The commissioner’s order takes effect on service, subject to being stayed, terminated, set aside or appealed.

The person may request a hearing in writing within 30 days after service. The hearing must be held within 30 days after the request is received unless the person requests a later date. The person bears the burden of showing continued service or participation does not, and is not likely to, threaten the licensee’s interests, its customers or public confidence. An affirmed or modified order is immediately final and appealable under the specified procedures. Conviction-based orders.

A possible second chance after ten years is discretionary. Someone subject to a removal or prohibition order under this enforcement subchapter may apply for release after ten years from issuance, regardless of the order’s duration or issuance date. The application must be sworn, use the prescribed form and include required fees. The commissioner may approve or deny it; that release decision is final and cannot be appealed. Ten years does not automatically erase an order or reinstate someone. Release provision.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill was replaced by a House committee substitute. The substitute clarified which other participants are covered, required intentional commission, participation or causation for the Section 152.403 misconduct category, expressly included people with outstanding money-transmission obligations, specified Section 152.409 procedures, and added the immediate-effect option. These qualifications matter: the enacted law is not just the broader introduced wording.

The engrossed, Senate-report and final operative provisions match the House substitute. The amendment index lists no floor amendments; that does not mean there was no committee rewrite. All versions.

The House passed the bill 135–0 with two present but not voting, and the Senate passed it 31–0. The governor signed it June 20, 2025; the votes satisfied the immediate-effect requirement. Official history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Customers, creditors and sound businesses may benefit from a more direct way to exclude dishonest or dangerous participants. Affected individuals can lose their position and access to a broad range of commissioner-regulated entities, and may incur hearing or legal costs. The specific findings, notice and review procedures are important safeguards; they do not guarantee that a particular person will prevail.

The May 9 fiscal note, consistent with the earlier notes, anticipates no significant state or local fiscal effect. It says the self-directed, semi-independent Department of Banking funds its own operations without imposing a cost on General Revenue, and any Attorney General costs can be absorbed with existing resources. It does not quantify private legal costs or money losses that future enforcement might prevent.

Review boundary: This explains authority and safeguards, not a finding against any business or person. HB3805 did not itself rewrite the underlying Section 152.403 license-enforcement list; separate HB3833 updated terminology there. No enforcement results or actual customer recoveries are claimed.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.