2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3824

HB3824 creates a state framework for battery-facility fire standards, inspections, emergency plans and first-responder training.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to fire safety standards and emergency operations plans for the operation of battery energy storage facilities; providing administrative penalties.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): King, Gerdes. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3824 creates a state framework for battery-facility fire standards, inspections, emergency plans and first-responder training. The act took effect September 1, 2025, but its new chapter applies only to facilities with capacity of at least one megawatt-hour and a commercial operations date on or after January 1, 2027. The insurance commissioner determines the criteria for that operations date. It is not a new requirement covering every existing battery installation or small household battery. Final law.

State standards: The insurance commissioner must adopt rules for design, installation, operation, safety and testing based solely on the specified UL Solutions and National Fire Protection Association standards. The act gives UL 9540A and the 2023 or later edition of NFPA 855 as examples. The commissioner may update rules as those source standards change. Facilities must meet the adopted standards in effect when their first building-permit or similar local-authorization application is submitted. The statute establishes this rulemaking framework; it does not print a complete engineering standard or establish a particular setback distance in its text. Standards provision.

Unless another statute expressly authorizes it, a city or county cannot adopt, maintain or enforce rules in the covered field that are inconsistent with those state standards. This is a limit on inconsistent local regulation, not a statement that local officials have no role.

Independent evaluations: Before commercial operation, the city—or county for an unincorporated site—may request an independent evaluation of design, safety and installation. The battery operator selects and pays a Texas-licensed independent engineer or another appropriately qualified consultant, who must report compliance deficiencies and recommended corrections to the requesting government.

The operator must make specified documents available if it holds or creates them: at the first permit/authorization application, site layout, manufacturer specifications, UL reports/listings, NFPA documentation, electrical drawings, monitoring procedures and fire-protection documentation; at installation’s start, the emergency plan and hazard-mitigation analysis. Separately, at least every five years, battery operators must commission and provide local government a fire-safety report covering enclosures, maintenance, emergency planning, hazards, monitoring/alarm history, fire-system testing and ventilation or equivalent safety equipment.

Emergency planning and training: Covered operators and municipally owned utilities must prepare a site-specific plan addressing risks—including potential environmental effects of equipment failure—hazard mitigation, shutdown/isolation, damaged equipment, drills, emergency communications and protection of nearby residents, neighboring property and responders. Before commercial operation, the plan goes to the local fire-protection responder. The plan and safety data sheets or comparable documents must also be accessible on site. Emergency-plan requirements.

They must offer local first responders education and annual training at no cost to the responders, including technology characteristics, responder protection, hazards, response protocols and an on-site review of access and major equipment. The statute requires an offer; it does not say every responder has already attended or that every emergency can be prevented.

The operator definition includes cooperatives, electric utilities, generators, self-generators and other owners/operators. Municipal utilities are expressly included in the standards and emergency-plan/training duties. Utility-owned supporting equipment is excluded from the facility definition; that does not amount to excluding every utility-owned battery resource from the chapter. Definitions and coverage.

Enforcement: The commissioner must delegate disciplinary/enforcement authority to the state fire marshal and adopt an appropriate administrative-penalty schedule under Government Code Section 417.010. That existing framework considers seriousness, harm, prior violations, deterrence, correction efforts and intent, and provides procedures for contesting penalties. HB3824 does not set a single flat dollar fine in its text. Enforcement provision and cross-referenced procedures.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill tied applicability to interconnection approval on or after January 1, 2027, placed standards with the state fire marshal and proposed three-year inspections. The House substitute added the one-megawatt-hour threshold, used an installation-date trigger, assigned rulemaking to the insurance commissioner, fixed the relevant standards at permit application, changed inspections to five years, revised documentation and emergency-plan content, and added express penalty authority.

The sole indexed floor amendment, Troxclair’s adopted third-reading amendment, changed that installation trigger from January 1, 2027 to September 1, 2025. That was reflected in the House-engrossed bill—but was not the final rule.

The Senate substitute restored January 1, 2027, now measured by a commissioner-defined commercial operations date, not installation or interconnection approval. It also clarified pre-operation evaluation and plan delivery, “similar” local authorizations and the enclosure evaluation. The Senate packet and May 25 journal, printed pages 2647–2648 show the adopted substitute; no additional Senate floor amendment changed it. Its operative text matches the final law. Amendment index and versions.

The House initially passed it 139–0 with two present but not voting, the Senate passed it 31–0, and the House concurred 135–2 with two present but not voting. The governor signed it June 20, 2025. Official history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Neighbors and first responders may benefit from site-specific information, planned procedures, training and outside safety evaluations. Operators pay for required consultants and implementation, while local governments retain reporting and request rights but face limits on inconsistent standards. The later coverage date leaves earlier facilities outside this new chapter; it does not establish that they are unregulated under every other law.

The final-stage fiscal note anticipates no significant state fiscal effect and assumes state costs can be absorbed within existing resources. It specifically warns of possible municipal-utility costs for planning, training and administrative penalties. It does not quantify those costs, private compliance costs or fires avoided. The introduced note’s “no significant local impact” statement should not replace that later warning.

Review boundary: This is a source-checked explanation of the enacted framework, not an engineering interpretation of UL/NFPA manuals, a survey of subsequently adopted rules, or certification that a specific facility is safe or compliant. Apply the actual adopted rules and relevant technical standards to a real project.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.