2025 Texas sessionsRegular and both called sessions have ended. This index covers House and Senate bills, not resolutions. Statuses come from official reports.

← Back to bills

2025 · Regular session · House bill

HB3833

HB3833 revises the rules for licensed money transmitters and currency-exchange businesses, including background information, acquisitions, financial statements, security and the handling of customer-backed investments.

Read bill highlights ↓

Official caption: Relating to the regulation of money services businesses.

Signed by governorSource-checked explanation published

Official report lists House author(s): Lambert. This does not identify sponsors or amendment drafters.

Report an error ↗

Bill explanation published · Version and amendment review scope is stated below · Individual amendment records may not be separately annotated.

Bill highlights

Selected points from the published explanation. Follow each point to its source-linked context; conditions and limits may matter.

Read the full explanation ↓

What does it do?

HB3833 revises the rules for licensed money transmitters and currency-exchange businesses, including background information, acquisitions, financial statements, security and the handling of customer-backed investments. It took effect September 1, 2025. Final law.

Background information: The requirement now directly addresses individuals who control a licensee or applicant, seek to acquire control, or are key individuals of a licensee or applicant, rather than being framed only as information from an individual applicant. Required information includes fingerprints and specified credit, criminal, regulatory and litigation history. The existing fingerprint exception for someone currently living abroad who has lived abroad for the preceding ten years remains; separate foreign-residency background-report requirements remain as well. A “key individual” is someone ultimately responsible for directing policies and procedures, such as an executive, manager, director or trustee. Information requirements.

Acquiring a business: The streamlined acquisition route no longer requires both the buyer and target to already be the same type of licensed money-services business. The target must be projected to meet its specified financial requirements after acquisition; a buyer that itself holds the relevant license must meet those requirements too. Prior approval or identification as a controlling person, license-history and management conditions, no material business-plan changes, notice and attestation requirements still matter. This is not permission for an unvetted buyer to take over without regulatory conditions. Streamlined acquisition.

Currency exchange versus money transmission: Currency-exchange license maintenance no longer cross-references the separate permissible-investment rule for money transmitters. Currency-exchange businesses still must maintain required financial security. Their annual financial statements—audited or unaudited as allowed—must now expressly follow United States generally accepted accounting principles. For initial proof of a money transmitter’s tangible net worth, the act adds the cross-reference allowing qualifying unaudited statements where the commissioner accepts them; it does not abolish audit requirements generally. License requirements, financial statements and net worth.

Security: A currency-exchange licensee’s required security must be a satisfactory surety bond, or a deposit instead with the commissioner’s approval. The act expressly requires prior approval for deposits replacing required security and removes the letter-of-credit wording from the general security-form provision. It does not change the currency-exchange security amount formula in Section 152.353(b)–(e). Security rules.

Investments backing money-transmission obligations: Demand and savings deposits in the specified unrestricted cash category must be held at a federally insured depository financial institution. The separate foreign-deposit category and its percentage, rating and other conditions remain; the act does not ban every foreign account. Nor does holding money at an insured institution guarantee that every dollar or customer claim is insured. Permissible investments.

Stablecoin was already permitted only to the extent of outstanding transmission obligations received in the same kind of stablecoin. HB3833 adds that it must be held directly by the licensee or with a third-party custodian meeting the commissioner’s qualifications. It does not newly authorize unlimited cryptocurrency speculation. The separate standby-letter-of-credit category for permissible investments remains, despite the deletion of letter-of-credit wording in the required-security provision. Those are different statutory rules.

Consistent enforcement terminology: The act replaces “principal” and “responsible person” wording with “key individual” in provisions addressing new applications after license expiration/surrender, license or delegate suspension/revocation, cease-and-desist orders, and certifications that an emergency order was received and understood. It also corrects the background-check cross-reference used when deciding an application is complete. The underlying enforcement grounds and procedures are not erased. Enforcement provisions.

What changed along the way?

The introduced bill already contained the main licensing, financial-security and stablecoin-custody changes. The House committee substitute reorganized the individual-information provisions into Section 152.105(a), added the corresponding completeness cross-reference correction, and carried through the wording correction for accounts held for the licensee’s customers in the foreign-deposit provision. Its restatement of the existing investment-percentage limits did not newly create those limits.

The engrossed, Senate-report and final operative text match the House substitute. The amendment index lists no floor amendments. All versions.

The House passed it 130–2 with two present but not voting; the Senate passed it 31–0. It was signed June 20, 2025, with a September 1 effective date. Official history.

For the full amendment record, open the official amendment index.

Official bill versions

Compare the published text versions in the official text index. A change is not attributed to a specific amendment here without a verified record.

Who could benefit—and who could bear the costs?

Customers may benefit from clearer responsibility for key people and more explicit safeguards for security, deposits and stablecoin custody. Businesses may gain a more workable acquisition process and clearer distinctions between currency exchange and transmission requirements. Licensees, controlling individuals and custodians may face documentation, accounting or compliance costs. The act does not promise lower transfer fees or eliminate the risk of a failed business or stablecoin.

The May 19 fiscal note, like the introduced and House-substitute notes, anticipates no significant state or local fiscal impact. It explains that the self-directed, semi-independent Department of Banking pays its own operating costs without imposing costs on General Revenue; Attorney General costs are assumed absorbable with existing resources. It does not quantify private compliance expenses or consumer savings.

Review boundary: This summarizes Texas statutory changes, not approval of a particular acquisition, custodian, stablecoin or investment, and not a complete treatment of federal financial-services law.

Official sources

Catalog report retrieved 2026-10-25. Check the official record for corrections or later changes.